British Prime Minister David Cameron is likely to speak on the steps of 10 Downing Street encouraging both sides to come together. If the result is close, he might say he intends to propose further reforms of the EU. The onus would be on him to show he has listened to Britons.
Downing Street insiders say he will not immediately reshuffle his Cabinet, but allow for a period of calm.
To bring some unity within his party, he is also likely to call a vote on the issue of Trident in the last week before the summer recess. The renewal of Britain’s nuclear deterrent is a policy on which his party is more or less entirely as one, while the opposition Labour Party is badly split. The expected Cabinet reshuffle is likely to come shortly before the party conference in the first week of October.
One senior Conservative MP said Cameron will want to be magnanimous to the losing side.
Former London mayor Boris Johnson would be given a major portfolio and it has been rumored that British Lord Chancellor Michael Gove could be made deputy prime minister, although Cameron is said to have been “genuinely hurt” by his friend’s attacks during the campaign. British Minister of State for Employment Priti Patel is also to take a seat around the Cabinet table.
A vote in favor of staying in the EU would boost British Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne’s hopes of replacing Cameron as prime minister and be a blow to Johnson. However, with the Tory membership overwhelmingly in favor of leaving the EU, it is unlikely to mark the end of the former London mayor’s ambitions.
A win for “Remain” would be a boost for Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, although the party is divided on whether Labour should be pushing the EU to make reforms to its rules on freedom of movement.
If the country votes to leave the EU, it is widely expected that Cameron will announce his intention to resign within hours of the result.
A number of senior “Vote Leave” campaigners, including a Cabinet minister, have told the Observer this need not and should not happen.
However, professor of government Vernon Bogdanor said that a loss of a referendum vote is often seen as a vote of no confidence in a leader.
“In 1979, the failure of the devolution referendum led to the resignation of the Callaghan government and an early general election, in which the government lost,” Bogdanor said. “In France in 1969, the failure of a referendum on constitutional reform led to the immediate resignation of [former French president Charles] de Gaulle. In September 2014, David Cameron confessed he would have resigned if the vote in Scotland had been for independence.”
However, Cameron is likely to stay on in an acting capacity until a new party leader is chosen by the membership, which might take several months. The successful candidate is likely to be someone who supported “Brexit” and there might be pressure for the new leader, and prime minister, to call a general election.
“Following a vote for Brexit, parliament must decide what EU law it intends to preserve, what should be modified and what should be repealed,” Bogdanor said. “Brexiters might argue that this exercise is best carried out by those who believe in it, rather than by the pro-EU majority in the present House of Commons.”
Meanwhile, the prime minister is expected to immediately apply the Article 50 procedure, which allows two years for talks, to terminate the UK’s membership and begin negotiations on the institutional and financial provisions of the separation. When agreement is reached it must be passed in the EU’s Council of Ministers by qualified majority vote as well as in the European parliament and in the House of Commons and the House of the Lords. The UK would then negotiate a separate deal to cover trading arrangements with the EU. That would require national ratification in every member state.
A vote to leave the EU might put pressure on Corbyn, who some have criticized for what they see as half-hearted support for the “Remain” campaign. While it is unlikely that the Labour Party’s membership would support a coup, one shadow Cabinet minister said a vote in favor of Brexit could prove to be as damaging to Labour in England and Wales as the Scottish referendum was to the party north of the border.
“It would mark the moment at which the Labour vote ignored the party,” the MP said. “It will be a breach from the party and millions of voters, especially in the north, will go elsewhere, maybe to [UK Independence Party] UKIP, maybe to a new-look Conservative Party.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath