One night in August last year, as the Central African Republic was gripped by a conflict between Christian and Muslim groups, UN peacekeeping troops descended on an enclave in search of a suspect. One of the peacekeepers is accused of taking a 12-year-old girl behind a truck and raping her.
“When I cried, he slapped me hard and put his hand over my mouth,” the girl told Amnesty International.
It was hardly the only act of brutality by peacekeepers in the world’s poorest nations. There were 99 allegations of sexual abuse against UN staff last year, a 25 percent increase from 2014, affecting peacekeeping operations in nations such as the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo), Haiti, Ivory Coast, Libya, Mali and Sudan.
Illustration: Mountain people
Vulnerable civilians in armed conflict have long been victims of abusive soldiers. However, 104,000 blue-helmeted troops now deployed are sent by more than a dozen nations to protect people. Their repeated failures are looming over the UN as it chooses a new leader and tarnishing the legacy of UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, who is ending his decade-long tenure amid accusations that he has not taken the issue seriously.
“For 10 years, the secretary-general has been happy to sweep all of these allegations under the carpet, but this ‘out of sight, out of mind’ strategy has broken down before he reached the end of his term,” former UN investigator Peter Gallo said. “The organization’s manifest failure is to properly investigate any form of wrongdoing.”
Ban’s office denies the accusations — the secretary-general was “shocked to the core” by the abuse, UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric said, adding that Ban has moved aggressively. In April, the UN announced an investigation of allegations that peacekeepers from at least three nations had abused more than 100 girls in the Central African Republic, where the World Bank said nearly half the population of about 5 million needs humanitarian aid.
However, damaging accounts keep surfacing, not only of abuse, but of failure to investigate and act. Internal UN documents, leaked by advocacy group, AIDS-Free World, include an episode in 2014 in which French troops were said to have forced four girls to perform obscene acts for a few US dollars.
Last week, Anders Kompass, a senior UN official who had tried to expose earlier sexual abuse of children by French and African troops, resigned in frustration.
Kompass said he was horrified by “the complete impunity for those who have been found to have, in various degrees, abused their authority.”
“This makes it impossible for me to continue working there,” he told IRIN news service.
US Republican Senator Bob Corker, who chairs the US House of Representatives’ Foreign Affairs Committee, called Kompass’ resignation “a damning indictment of the leadership at the United Nations that has failed to end the horrific sexual exploitation and abuse by peacekeepers, and protect those who report wrongdoing.”
Ban’s successor must make fixing the problem a high priority, said Richard Gowan, a fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations.
UN officials have been publicly interviewing more than a dozen potential successors to Ban, with a final selection expected in October. All have said they would work to end the mistreatment.
“There are too many stories of sexual abuse by peacekeepers and too little evidence of operations succeeding,” Gowan said. “The next secretary-general will need a plan both to clean up peacekeeping and give it a greater sense of strategic purpose.”
Peacekeeping dates from the origins of the UN, but has grown enormously. In 1948, the UN sent 50 guards to monitor the Israeli-Arab truce. Now, about 104,000 troops with access to attack helicopters and drones are deployed across Asia, Africa, the Caribbean and the Middle East. They are joined by an additional 16,500 civilian personnel. In the past 25 years, the budget has ballooned 16-fold to US$8.3 billion.
Sexual abuse by UN peacekeepers was first documented in Bosnia and Kosovo in the early 1990s. As the frequency has increased, so has impunity for the perpetrators, partly because responsibility for punishment falls to home nations. The UN can send troops home and document the reasons why, but it cannot impose criminal charges or jail offenders.
“The UN is famous as a place where rapists get away with rape,” Aids-Free World cofounder and director Paula Donovan said.
The latest scandals go back to 2013 when boys at a refugee camp in Bangui said they were ordered to perform oral sex and raped by peacekeepers from France, Chad and Equatorial Guinea. A UN official produced a report that was sent to the human rights office in Geneva as well as to the UN Children’s Emergency Fund. Neither took action.
Beatrice Edwards, executive director of advocacy group Government Accountability Project, said UN staff are reluctant to report sexual abuse for fear of losing their jobs.
Kompass, then-field operations director at the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, ultimately got fed up and leaked the buried report to French diplomats in Geneva, who sent investigators to Bangui.
The UN rewarded Kompass for his efforts by suspending him and starting a disciplinary investigation. Miranda Brown, who worked with Kompass, then passed the report to the US mission. Brown’s contract was not renewed, which she said was retaliation for her actions.
“The real problem is that the UN’s leadership are only accountable to themselves,” said Brown, who has testified at congressional hearings.
An external panel appointed last year by Ban issued a report in December last year that accused some UN officials of obstructing the investigation and focusing on punishing Kompass.
It said the child sexual abuse report went “from desk to desk, inbox to inbox.”
“The end result was a gross institutional failure to respond to the allegations in a meaningful way,” it said. “In the absence of concrete action to address wrongdoing by the very persons sent to protect vulnerable populations, the credibility of the UN and peacekeeping operations are in jeopardy.”
The problem is not getting better on its own, although a few steps have been taken. Ban appointed a special coordinator, Jane Holl Lute, a former deputy secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security. The UN Security Council has also authorized the peacekeeping office to send home troops whose nations fail to hold them accountable.
However, the grinding bureaucracy moves slowly.
“For the UN to be fixed, it requires political will from other countries beyond the US,” said Heritage Foundation researcher Brett Schaefer, who has long been critical of the international organization. “The key is persevering after the spotlight has gone.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing