Irish perfumier David Cox is preparing for a sales drive across the sea in Britain, but fears that if the country votes to leave the EU next month the expansion would be thrown into disarray.
From small exporters such as Cox to the central bank, Ireland is finding that uncertainty is the biggest enemy in trying to anticipate the consequences of a British exit, or “Brexit.”
Cox — whose Fragrances of Ireland business operates from a bustling warehouse south of Dublin — said any blow to the confidence of the British gift shop owners he supplies and their customers would frustrate his plans.
“For a small company like us, we need people to be willing to take a chance and that requires them to be confident that the end consumer has got £20, £30, £40 [US$28.72, US$43.08, US$57.44] in his or her pocket to spend on something new. If they’re worried, they won’t,” Cox said.
Ireland has the EU’s fastest growing economy, but also more to lose than any other member state when its nearest and largest trading partner decides in a referendum on June 23 whether to quit the union that both countries joined together 43 years ago.
Brexit, which Irish Prime Minister Enda Kenny has called “a major strategic risk” to Ireland, could have far-reaching implications not only for trade and an economy still recovering from a banking collapse in 2008-2009.
Peace in British-ruled Northern Ireland, security of energy supplies and freedom of movement for the large numbers of Irish citizens working in Britain might also fall into doubt.
Ireland might not spring to mind as a perfume producer. However, Fragrances of Ireland — like so many firms in a country of only 4.5 million people — has built up its business in export markets from its base in the small County Wicklow town of Kilmacanoge.
Seventy percent of sales are in the US, compared with only 10 percent in Britain. However, Cox aims to raise the number of small, independent British retailers that his firm supplies from 150 to 1,000 within the next two years.
Two years is also the period laid down in the EU’s Lisbon Treaty for any country to negotiate an EU withdrawal.
No one knows what relationship Britain might hammer out with the EU should it leave and Cox fears the country’s economy and consumer sentiment would weaken during such a period. This would make it tough for his business to establish its name alongside global rivals such as L’Oreal and Estee Lauder.
“Our plans would definitely be stalled because it’s easy to cut back on a bottle of perfume you don’t know,” said Cox, whose firm employs 25 full-time and part-time workers.
Evidence is growing that the British economy is already slowing before the referendum and the pound has weakened against the euro. Although not yet critical, Cox said this depreciation is hurting his profit margins.
Some larger Irish firms have hedged against the currency risks.
However, Cox said there is little a company the size of his can do to protect itself.
In a survey of members last month, the Irish Exporters Association said 60 percent reported that the pound’s weakness had already affected their business. Just 5 percent were in favor of Britain leaving the EU.
The Irish Ministry of Finance last month said that the level of uncertainty from abroad generally was higher than at any stage since the financial crisis.
A further 5 percentage point depreciation of the pound against the euro would reduce Irish GDP by 0.8 percent per year for the next six years, it estimated.
Ireland is vulnerable to any Brexit-related recession in Britain. Research by Davy Stockbrokers showed that a 1 percent decrease in UK economic output has in the past led to a 0.3 percent drop in Ireland.
The Irish economy is still forecast to expand by about 5 percent this year, but the country needs all the growth it can achieve to cut a public debt that at about 90 percent of GDP remains a problem.
Historic and personal links between Britain and what is now the Irish Republic — which broke away in the 1920s after a guerrilla war of independence — are also strong. Many Britons have family roots in Ireland and Irish citizens resident in Britain can vote in the referendum.
Kenny used his re-election as prime minister to highlight the “profound importance” of the referendum and has told British Prime Minister David Cameron — who is campaigning to remain in the EU — that he would do whatever he can to help.
Irish Minister of Finance Michael Noonan also said that Dublin would be urging the Irish community in Britain and Northern Ireland to vote to stay in.
Ireland acknowledges there are limits to its own contingency planning.
A Brexit group of senior officials has been set up in Kenny’s department, government sources have said.
Dublin is “exploring the potential risks and planning accordingly,” Noonan told parliament last month.
The central bank has warned that Irish banks, which have lent heavily to the British property sector, would be hurt by a Brexit and has been working with them on their preparations.
However, generally advance planning is extremely difficult.
“It’s unambiguous that the economic effect on Ireland is negative — the question is how big,” Central Bank of Ireland chief economist Gabriel Fagan said last month. “That depends very crucially on the scenario you envisage regarding the relationship between Britain and the rest of the EU.”
Irish farmers and food producers, major suppliers to the UK, are also vulnerable, but the risks go beyond economics.
Dublin officials worry about the impact on Northern Ireland, which has the only land frontier between the UK and the rest of the EU. During three decades of violence, this was marked by military checkpoints until a 1998 peace deal.
The fear for many is that any new border restrictions could endanger peace by re-energizing demands for a united Ireland, which would raise tensions with pro-British unionists.
Northern Ireland Deputy First Minister Martin McGuinness has already called for a vote on unification if Britain leaves the EU.
Doubts also surround the right of Irish citizens to live and work in Britain, which long predates the EU.
Pro-Brexit campaigners want tougher controls on immigration from the EU. While these demands have been directed at eastern Europeans, an Irish government-commissioned report said last year that a Brexit also opens the possibility of restrictions on the free movement of workers between Ireland and Britain.
Brexit might not be all bad.
The report said some companies keen to stay in the EU might move from Britain to Ireland.
However, it also flagged risks to the power supply security. If the UK electricity market became independent of the rest of the EU, Ireland would be vulnerable to any problems in Britain. The alternative, improved interconnection directly with the EU, would be very costly at a time when Ireland is struggling to meet basic infrastructure and housing needs.
Higher energy costs would hit Irish firms, which are already facing increased wage demands at home. Their competitive edge would be further eroded if Britain imposed any customs duties or new regulations that were costly to meet.
Such worries weigh on Pat O’Neill, whose Zenith Adhesive Components firm makes high-tech electronic, automotive and medical components in the central Irish town of Athlone.
“Nobody is that unique. A lot of what I do can be done quite easily by English competitors and security of supply is very important,” said O’Neill, whose clients include Jaguar Land Rover and the British Army.
“The customer could say there may be a tariff put on this in a couple of years time, I’m tooling up now for a six-year project so I’ll give this one to the UK guy. That’s happening already, in a small way, but it is happening,” he said.
However, even if Brexit happens, Irish firms believe Britain would remain open for business and they would manage, whatever the trade relationship.
“It’s not going to become North Korea overnight,” Cox said. “I’d prefer it doesn’t happen, but we’d get on with it and find the best way around it.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath