For a Russian, there is never a bad time or place for a classical music concert.
And for the concert in the ancient ruins of a war-ravaged Syrian city, staged last week by Russia’s premier orchestra, the Mariinsky Theater Orchestra, the invitation came as improbably as the event itself.
The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs called my cellphone on a Saturday morning: Be ready to fly to Syria in a few days. We cannot tell you anything more, but there is a dress code: Bring a bulletproof vest.
Illustration: Tania Chou
So began the latest twist to Russia’s military intervention in the Syrian civil war, which has been characterized by subterfuge and misdirection since it started in September last year. That is when the world was told that giant Ilyushin 76 transport airplanes flying from Russia to Syria were carrying humanitarian aid, when in fact they were bringing soldiers and military supplies.
Airstrikes commenced.
The Russians said their warplanes were targeting terrorists, but Western governments said the real objective was to prop up Moscow’s ally, the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
In March, Russian President Vladimir Putin, proclaimed the operation completed, yet at least hundreds of soldiers and dozens of aircraft remained.
The curtain pulled back, if just a little, on Russia’s Syrian venture when the Russian press plane touched down around dawn one day last week at the Kremlin’s air base in the coastal city of Latakia.
About 100 Moscow-based foreign reporters emerged, blinking in the sun and were greeted by Russia’s desert soldiers. Round, sunburned Slavic faces peered from under tan helmets.
The tour of Russia’s battle for hearts and minds — and ears — in Syria began in a tent mess, where a line of cheery middle-aged women ladled out kasha and tushonka, the Russian form of Spam.
One group of soldiers, dressed in blue shorts and T-shirts, played volleyball and jabbed away at punching bags for the television cameras.
An enlisted man was placed in a shipping container turned library, his nose trained on an open encyclopedia of Russian military medals, as if, improbably, he had suddenly decided to study up, as cameras rolled.
“Defense is a system of political, economic, social, legal and military means,” a placard on the wall read, seeming to illustrate the modern Russian way of war that we were witnessing.
Sometimes called a hybrid war after the intervention in Ukraine in 2014 that brought these tactics to light, it is a doctrine of tightly integrated diplomacy and messaging — including the art of military misdirection called maskirovka — along with conventional force, at play now in Syria.
The strategy prizes so-called soft power. However, in Syria, old-fashioned hard power also abounds.
The air base is a panoramic scene, cluttered with helicopters and planes. Russian armored vehicles and trucks sit on acres of parking lots. Despite the declared end of their presence here, there was no sign of packing up. During our visit, a Syrian road crew was laying fresh, smoking black asphalt to make room for more.
However, Russia, as the US tried in Iraq, has also been attempting to navigate the whirlpools of the war’s local politics.
Reporters were paraded through a “reconciliation center,” where a dozen or so Russian officers take calls from armed units seeking to join the ceasefire announced in February and aid them in negotiating local truces with the Syrian army. A flat-screen television hung on the wall beaming a static image of a dove, an olive sprig and the Syrian flag.
To illustrate its peacemaking efforts, the Russian military brought the press pool by bus to the dusty village of Kawkab, in Hama Province, about 115km from the still embattled city of Aleppo and near a front line.
The site of ruined cinder-block homes, on a hill overlooking olive orchards, appeared deserted at first, but then a crowd of children, chanting and waving posters of al-Assad, emerged to greet the buses.
“It took many months for the warring sides to come to the negotiating table, but it has finally come to fruition,” the Russian military spokesman, Major General Igor Konashenkov, said of the place.
In a large green tent pitched in a ruined market, Syrian military officers signed a ceasefire agreement with village leaders.
Then, through a slit in the back of the tent, young men with red-and-white headscarves covering their faces materialized, said to be newly reconciled Muslim militants from the village.
With the Russian military officers observing from their seats on white plastic lawn furniture, the young men clanked battered Kalashnikovs onto a table, surrendering their weapons, then pressed a thumbprint on a sheet of paper.
The Russian military said that it has overseen more than 90 such ceremonies in towns and villages since February, reconciling more than 7,000 former rebels, and that this work, not merely the airstrikes backing al-Assad’s forces, is central to its presence.
However, it was unclear who had reconciled with whom in this ceremony.
Asked through a Russian military interpreter when he had come over to the government side, one of the village leaders who signed the agreement, Akhmed Mubarok, appeared confused.
He said he had never been on any other side.
“I always supported the government,” he said.
The interpreter shrugged.
Outside the tent, a Russian press official suggested I interview a local man, Mohamad Shoikh, who, surprisingly, spoke English.
“Russia has a very good army,” Shoikh said. “We need the Russian army. We never want the Russian army to leave. We want the whole Russian army to come here. Putin is a good leader.”
All the while, there was not a word of confirmation about the concert in Palmyra, the city famous for its ruins from Roman and Near East civilizations that had been in the bloody grip of the Islamic State (IS), formerly known as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria until earlier this year.
This was a military operation, cloaked in secrecy, to insert not only the journalists, but three stand-up basses, cellos and other instruments and musicians from St Petersburg into the Syrian front-line city.
After a dawn departure from the Mediterranean coast, Russian helicopter gunships buzzed overhead as separate convoys of buses, with the press and the string section, drove east into the Syrian desert.
Afterward, British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond criticized the concert as “a tasteless attempt to distract attention” from suffering Syrians, and said an airstrike on a refugee camp that day had killed 28 people.
Russia denied its planes bombed the camp.
However, the concert was simply, starkly beautiful, and unfolded as the late afternoon sun faded over the ruins.
Mariinsky director Valery Gergiev said he chose the pieces for their optimistic emotions, to be played on the same stage where Islamic State militants last summer had filmed a video of a mass execution.
“We protest against barbarism that destroyed tremendous monuments to world culture,” Gergiev said. “We protest against executions of people, here on this stage.”
Played in a second-century Roman amphitheater, it was a concert of a lifetime — and surely risked a few lives along the way. The Islamic State lines were said to be about 15km away; outgoing artillery boomed as the buses arrived.
Then the gentler sounds of Pavel Milyukov playing Johann Sebastian Bach’s Chaconne for Solo Violin echoed through the eerie desert space.
Sergei Roldugin, a musician friend of Putin recently implicated in the Panama Papers financial scandal, acknowledged after the concert that he had missed notes in a cello solo of the Russian composer Rodion Shchedrin, though the piece was pleasant all the same. The orchestra played Sergei Prokofiev’s Symphony No. 1.
After the solemn harmony, some comic dissonance was obtained on the return flight, over Iraqi and Iranian airspace.
Some Russian journalists, it turned out, had slipped out of the security bubble in Latakia to purchase several bottles of a local tipple, arak, which the Russian press corps nicknamed Igilovka, or “the Little IS.”
Bottles of the Little IS came out. A wicked miasma floated around the cabin.
Americans and Russians agreed on one thing: Igilovka must be destroyed.
And it was, before the final approach to the Chkalovsky military airfield outside Moscow.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath