India is currently facing its worst water crisis in years, with an estimated 330 million people — one-quarter of its population — affected by severe drought. Ethiopia is also dealing with its worst drought in decades, which has already contributed to the failure of many crops, creating food shortages that now affect about one-tenth of the population. Under such circumstances, the risk of tension over resources is high.
In the past, droughts of this severity have led to conflict and even wars between neighboring communities and states. One of the first in recorded history erupted about 4,500 years ago, when the city-state of Lagash — nestled between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers in modern-day Iraq — diverted water from its neighbor, Umma. Competition for water sparked violent incidents in ancient China and fueled political instability in pharaonic Egypt.
COMPETITION
Today, wars between nations over water resources are uncommon, owing to improved dialogue and cross-border cooperation, but, within nations, competition for scarce water is becoming a more common source of instability and conflict, especially as climate change increases the severity and frequency of extreme weather events.
As the World Bank details in its new report High and Dry: Climate Change, Water and the Economy, limited and erratic water availability reduces economic growth, induces migration and ignites civil conflict, which fuels further potentially destabilizing migration.
This cycle has been apparent in some regions for decades. In sub-Saharan Africa, for example, periods of low rainfall over the past 20 years have often been followed by spikes in violence, civil wars and regime change. In many parts of rural Africa and India, a decline in rainfall has acted as a “push factor” for internal or cross-border migration to more water-abundant places, often cities, creating new social pressures as the numbers of displaced people grow.
In the report, the World Bank predicts that water scarcity could act as a conflict-risk multiplier, fueling cycles of resource-driven conflict, violence and displacement, especially in already water-stressed regions, such as the Middle East and the Sahel in Africa, where agriculture remains an important source of employment.
MANAGEMENT
Fortunately, there is a way to avoid the cycle of poverty, deprivation and conflict. If nations take action now to implement effective water-management policies and practices, backed by well-designed incentives, they can not only reverse a slide toward water scarcity, but also raise their rates of economic growth by as much as 6 percentage points per year.
One water-scarce nation that has taken action to improve its resilience to climate change is Morocco. In years of low rainfall, Morocco’s river-basin authorities give the lowest priority to crop irrigation, the largest consumer of the nation’s water, but, of course, agriculture remains critical to feed the population. So the government has been investing in modernizing irrigation infrastructure to provide farmers with more efficient water services that enable them to adjust more easily to variations in water availability.
The Moroccan authorities are also working to improve groundwater governance, to avoid over-extraction. Farmers engaged in rain-fed agriculture receive support that helps them to make better use of rainfall — such as through the introduction of climate-resilient practices like direct seeding — resulting in higher yields than traditional practices produce during dry years.
PLANNING
The message from Morocco — and from the report — is that, with smart water policies and interventions, nations can ensure a climate-resilient, water-secure future. At the core of effective water-management strategies is improved planning for water-resource allocation, the adoption of incentives to increase efficiency, investment in infrastructure for improved water security and better urban planning, risk management and citizen engagement. The recently created International High-level Panel on Water, comprising 10 heads of state, is likely to be promoting precisely this agenda to foster better water management internationally.
Of course, not every nation is likely to follow the same path in safeguarding a water-secure future.
However, as nations develop their strategies, they can look to one another for ideas and insights into what works — and what does not work.
With strong and prudent action, governments around the world can cope effectively with the natural limitations and uncertainties affecting water resources, ensuring that their people and economies are prepared for what might lie ahead.
Laura Tuck is World Bank group vice president for sustainable development.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing