“Apples and Oranges” is an example that economists usually use to explain the difficulty of comparison. Taiwan’s economy is facing consecutive double-digit exports declines and repeated cuts to the GDP growth rate. Businesspeople want the manufacturing sector to become warmer — with more Apple Inc purchases from Taiwan. The service industry hopes that tourist numbers from China do not fall for political reasons so more pineapple cakes will be sold. “Apple and Pineapple” is a good way to illustrate Taiwan’s trade.
Apple sold 230 million iPhones last year. According to Merrill Lynch in 2014, integrated chip (IC) and optical components in mobile phones alone cost US$25, and original equipment manufacturing for assembly iPhones earns US$5 per device. If we calculate US$30 for every iPhone, that means Taiwanese firms earned about US$7 billion last year. That does not include other components such as touch screens or connectors that Taiwanese companies made for iPhones.
IPhone revenue is just 65 percent of Apple products; the company also sells iPads, MacBooks and Apple watches.
A Taiwan Institute of Economic Research survey found that Chinese tourists last year contributed NT$180 billion (US$5.6 billion) to the economy.
In 2008, there were 288,000 Chinese tourists, out of 5 million tourists to Taiwan, including 1 million Japanese. Then the government opened the door to Chinese tourists. In 2009, the number of Chinese tourists exceeded 1 million and in 2012 it reached 2.5 million. Last year 4 million Chinese visited Taiwan.
Increasing numbers of Chinese visitors not only benefit the tourism industry, but also help the economy and employment, especially in Nantou, Chiayi and Hualien counties.
This year, Taiwan’s economy still faces headwinds, but the two factors mentioned above will not be able to help us as before due to some problems.
Innovation at Apple seems to have slowed down after Steve Jobs’ death; only the size of iPhones has changed in recent years. The company’s revenue showed its first decline in 13 years last quarter. Analysts predict that 10 percent fewer iPhones will be sold than last year. That means Taiwanese factories’ revenue may be down US$700 million at least from this product.
The most affected industries will be information-technology and IC firms, which represent one-third of Taiwan’s export or manufacturing value.
After the presidential election in January, Beijing reduced its approval of tourists to Taiwan step by step. If tourist numbers decline by 1 million this year, Taiwan’s tourism revenue will be down by NT$45 billion. Business owners and workers in the tourist industry will face new challenges.
With the probable slowdown in purchases of Apple products and pineapple cakes, the question is whether Taiwan should concentrate on one company or one tourism source. To resolve the problem, the new government could do less in the short term.
The five innovation industries that president-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has mentioned could not take effect in this year — a new “quasi-sovereign wealth fund” for industry development needs time for discussion and fundraising.
Meanwhile, Taiwan’s information and communication technology businesses should try cooperating with China’s IT firms such as Huawei or Xiaomi.
As for tourism, we hope the new government not only maintains cross-strait economic relationships, but also tries to attract more tourists from Southeast Asia or other nations.
If business and the government work to reduce risk by diversifying customers to new businesses or new areas, it will make Taiwan’s goods and service trade grow healthier.
Gordon Sun is an economist at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath