Three years after the end of the World War II, Shinji Nakao stepped off a boat on to Nagashima Island, Japan, convinced that his life was about to take a turn for the better.
The 14-year-old had been diagnosed with leprosy, then a widely misunderstood disease that struck fear into its victims and condemned them to decades of appalling treatment at the hands of the Japanese state.
“I thought I was going to get help and be able to lead a normal life,” said Nakao, 81. “It felt like I was going on a little adventure.”
Illustration: Yusha
However, his optimism vanished as soon as he arrived at Aiseien, a sanatorium for hundreds of leprosy patients looking out over the Seto Inland Sea that separates the island from mainland Japan.
Nakao — thereafter referred to as patient No. 4973 — and other new arrivals were taken into quarantine, stripped of their clothes and valuables and photographed, before being made to lower themselves into a bath of hot water and cresol disinfectant. They spent one week to 10 days being observed in hospital wards, segregated by sex, age and the severity of their symptoms.
“It was like entering a prison,” said Nakao, who shared a dormitory with 70 other children. “We were referred to by our numbers, and of course we couldn’t leave. I realized as soon as I set foot on Nagashima my freedom had vanished.”
However, Nakao was not the only member of his family to suffer as a result of leprosy, now commonly referred to as Hansen’s disease after Gerhard Armauer Hansen, the Norwegian doctor who identified the bacterium that causes leprosy in 1873.
Soon after he was taken to Aiseien, health officials disinfected the home in Nara Prefecture he had shared with his mother and elder brother.
Their neighbors, fearing that Nakao’s family could also be infected, kept their distance.
Last week, 20 years after Japan ended the compulsory segregation of people living with leprosy, the families of former patients launched a class-action suit seeking compensation for decades of discrimination simply for being related to people with leprosy.
More than 500 people, including siblings, spouses, children and grandchildren, are seeking ¥5 million (US$45,971) each and a public apology from the Japanese central government, claiming that the stigma attached to the disease had harmed their employment, housing, education and marriage prospects.
They include Mitsuko Okudaira, who was brought up by her grandmother after her parents were taken to a sanatorium in Okinawa.
“I hope the central government will acknowledge the present situation, in which family members are still discriminated against and cannot talk about what they have been through, and do something to resolve the problem,” she said, according to the Asahi Shimbun.
Under the 1953 leprosy prevention law, Japan rounded up thousands of patients and forced them to live in sanatoriums located in mountains or on remote islands, although the practice had been commonplace since the turn of the century.
In prewar Japan, sufferers were turned over to the secret police by medical authorities, while patients and other disabled people were thought of as “polluted” and “stains on the flag of the Rising Sun.”
The segregation law, which was not repealed until 1996, forced patients to undergo abortions and sterilization. They were made to perform backbreaking work for poverty pay and subjected to imprisonment without trial for assaulting staff or attempting to escape.
In 2001 a court ruled that the policy of segregating Hansen’s disease patients was unconstitutional and should have been discontinued after effective multidrug therapies were made widely available by the end of the 1950s.
In a surprise move, then-Japanese prime minister Junichiro Koizumi offered a formal apology and promised not to contend compensation claims former patients had brought against the state.
The end of forced quarantine came too late for Nakao, even though he was declared free of Hansen’s disease in 1970. His wife, Yuriko — a fellow Aiseien resident — and his mother and brother had all died in the 1990s, leaving him with no family connections.
“If it had happened 30 or 40 years earlier it would have given people like me a chance to reintegrate into society,” said Nakao, who suffered lasting damage to his eyesight and the peripheral nerves in his hands and legs.
“But even after you’re cured, the discrimination continues. That’s because the symptoms are still there in the most obvious parts of your body — on your face and hands. Even the healthy relatives of people with Hansen’s disease had to leave their homes. After I arrived here I heard that my old house had turned white after being disinfected. My mother and brother carried on living there, but life was awful for them. After all, I was the one who was ill, not them,” he said.
Today, almost 40 percent of the 1,597 people living in state sanatoriums still use aliases to prevent their families from being discriminated against, according to a survey by the Asahi Shimbun.
“Ignorance about Hansen’s disease meant that it wasn’t just the patients who suffered, but their families too,” Aiseien official Noriko Mori said. “Even now, many of the people here don’t know if their brothers and sisters on the outside are still alive. They have no one to come and visit them.”
Aiseien’s ossuary contains the remains of 3,600 people who died at the facility since it opened in 1930.
“Their families didn’t come to collect their ashes,” Mori said. “Even in death, they weren’t able to finally go home.”
Nakao is one of 204 people still living on Nagashima. Their average age is 85, and most have been on the island for about six decades.
At its peak in 1943, Aiseien was home to more than 2,000 men, women and children. There were schools and leisure activities, but in every other respect, the sanatorium was little more then an open prison from which most would never escape.
After leaving school, Nakao worked as a farmer, plumber and rubbish collector, and eventually became head of the residents’ association at Aiseien, one of 13 state sanatoriums that are now home to 1,500 people, all of whom have recovered from the disease.
The Aiseien of today is a happier place, where a large team of doctors and nurses provide medical care and tourists come to the facility’s museum to learn firsthand about Japan’s uneasy relationship with Hansen’s disease. In 1988, a new road bridge — the Bridge to Humanity — finally linked Nagashima to the outside world.
“When I look at that landing pier now, I think back to when I arrived here all those years ago,” Nakao said. “Except that now I know I’m free to come and go as I please. I enjoy my occasional trips off the island, but I’ve been here more than 60 years although it sounds strange, I can say now that this place really feels like home.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath