President-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has named former minister of finance Lin Chuan (林全) as premier, and he is to be tasked with forming the Cabinet of the incoming Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration. The names of other Cabinet members are to be made public in due course. Many Taiwanese political observers have turned their attention to the likely candidates, demonstrating the high expectations the nation has of the new government.
Education authorities have been singled out by commentators for putting too much emphasis on developing business administrators and managers. It seems as if education is increasingly disconnected from society, or that business students are often inadequately prepared to enter the work place, and this is becoming a problem. Arguments have been put forward by both the humanities and sciences camps. However, in a society that places economic development ahead of culture, pragmatic arguments are often made light of.
Taiwan, under the Republic of China (ROC) system, has yet to free itself from the Chinese way of thinking. Education — in particular the development of civic awareness — is burdened with too much outmoded thinking which has forced a straight jacket onto learners.
Under the ROC system, civic awareness education is often caught in a trap of its own design. President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration has attempted, through amendments to the humanities curriculum, to force each new generation to be educated in “Chinese.” This has resulted in restrictive and unenlightened education. There is still much work that needs to be done to eliminate this problem.
At the end of the 20th century, many forward-looking countries orientated their national curricula to topics relevant to the new millennium. However, in Taiwan — held down by its Chinese one-party-state government — authorities sought to pull Taiwan back into China’s fold and return the country to its past. If the winds of change are now blowing across Taiwan, this is purely down to the efforts of Taiwanese to pull their country back from the abyss, despite the government’s best efforts to prevent them from doing so.
In the 21st century, Taiwan experienced eight years of a DPP administration under former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and a further eight years of Ma’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) administration. The nation is on the cusp of a new era with a Tsai-led DPP administration. In the past 16 years Taiwan has gone through a period of progress followed by a counter-revolution. Now is the time for a shake-up of the nation’s civic education in order to broaden the horizons of young Taiwanese.
Questions of individual identity, Taiwanese identity and what it means to be Taiwanese and a citizen of the world should all be explored in civic education. It should not be limited to a binary comparison of Taiwanese versus Chinese identity.
Individuals should be understood through their physical being and consciousness. Just as in society there is economics and there is culture, important horizons are developed through an individual’s physical being and personal character. For Taiwanese, time (history) and space (geography) have provided them with a sense of place. In the eyes of the law, Taiwanese belong to Taiwan, and this creates a differentiation between being Taiwanese and being a citizen of the People’s Republic of China. In this globalized world, Taiwanese are also world citizens with an international outlook and sense of understanding.
Civic education in Taiwan must place more importance on individual identity, Taiwanese identity and the place Taiwanese occupy as citizens of the world. There is much work to be done.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Edward Jones
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS