Seemingly worried that outsiders might not know how divided its ranks really are, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) keeps putting on performances that highlight its internal contradictions.
As the party’s presidential candidate last year, Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) — also known as the “Little Red Pepper” (小辣椒) — was defeated by the KMT’s local factions and replaced by then-KMT chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). However, she has made a big comeback, sending the factions sprawling by getting elected as KMT chairwoman.
CALL FOR REFORM
From a positive point of view, Hung’s election shows that the KMT has become more democratic, but from a negative perspective, the KMT has gone back to its true face. For the public, that is actually a good thing, because they have had enough of being bamboozled by a KMT made up to look like something different.
Hung’s investiture ceremony was filled with calls for reform and unity, but it all seemed rather despondent and tatty. Some party members have quit. Some say there are still a lot of members who are not happy about Hung.
Five pro-localization members of the party’s Central Standing Committee were absent from its first meeting under the new party leader. Chu, the previous party chairman, made a brief appearance.
Only former KMT chairman “Grandpa” Lien Chan (連戰) stepped up to the pulpit to preach about some old themes.
Grandpa Lien cannot stop sulking about having lost two presidential elections. He still blames the March 19 shooting of then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) for dousing his imperial dream in 2004.
He has not explained how his 2000 election campaign had spent NT$12 billion (US$370.3 million at current exchange rates) or how much money went up in smoke in his 2004 campaign.
Lien called on the KMT not to bow its head before unjust things, but to “say what should be said and do what should be done.”
He has got to be kidding.
How many unjust things has the KMT done in Taiwan? How much state property has it swallowed?
People are calling for transitional justice, but the KMT continues to desperately resist it. Is that what Lien calls “doing what needs to be done?”
Grandpa Lien said the KMT should take the path of ordinary people and stand alongside them. What he said sounds very “democratic,” but Hung and her clique have disparaged such ideas as being a “populist” tendency in the KMT.
Has Grandpa Lien forgotten what happened last year, when the public urged him not to go and stand like a subordinate beside Chinese President “Uncle” Xi Jinping (習近平) to review Beijing’s military parade commemorating the 70th anniversary of the end of World War II? Why did he turn a deaf ear to the public’s call on that occasion?
‘ONE CHINA’?
Just as the KMT was inaugurating its new chairwoman, an opinion poll published by the Mainland Affairs Council showed that 72.7 percent of respondents do not agree with the idea that “both sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to one China.”
However, Hung and her gang are keen on pushing the so-called “1992 consensus” and “one China, same interpretation” (一中同表), which go completely against what most people want. Her “Chinese” Nationalist Party has no intention of standing alongside ordinary people.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS