If one fist bump could endanger Finland’s increasingly stressed tradition of consensus politics, then Finnish Prime Minister Juha Sipila and a Cabinet colleague may just have achieved this dubious distinction.
In a nod to popular culture, a smiling Sipila and Finnish Minister of Finance Alexander Stubb punched each other’s fists to celebrate a breakthrough in negotiating one of Finland’s toughest austerity deals in decades with trade unions.
The unions, whose members face de facto wage cuts in the name of reviving economic growth, were deeply unimpressed by the public show of exuberance earlier this month.
Illustration: Mountain people
“Members were very upset. They thought that they were mocking workers, saying something like: ‘Now we can drive them into the ground,’” said PAM union leader Ann Selin, who represents 232,000 workers.
The fist bump was not a first in international politics. Barack and Michelle Obama exchanged one at the Democratic party convention before his election to the US presidency in 2008.
However, Sipila and Stubb are hardly the golden couple of Finnish politics. Before becoming prime minister, Sipila was a millionaire businessman while Stubb has the image of a jet setter with a liking for fine suits.
This made the gesture all the more difficult to stomach for union leaders after what was only a preliminary deal, with a detailed agreement still to be hammered out in the coming months.
“It did not help at all,” Selin said.
Unions were outraged at politicians who appeared out of touch, underlying the fragility of the Nordic model, under which parties of the center-right and center-left, organized labor and business strive to reach consensus deals without conflict.
The danger is that the preliminary accord might still collapse as the Finnish consensus is tested by rising debt, unemployment and lengthy economic stagnation.
Relying on traditional consensus politics, Sipila wants to persuade the unions to cut labor costs by 5 percent. It is part of his push to raise the competitiveness of the Finnish economy after three years of recession with some of the deepest austerity and welfare since World War II.
With unemployment at 9.4 percent, Stubb said the fist bump was to celebrate the new jobs that he believes the reforms will create.
He has heralded a Finnish spring of “three big decisions that need to be taken to change the course of the country” — the labor deal, a parliamentary vote on budget cuts and reforms to cut the cost of healthcare.
NOT VERY FINNISH
At stake is the consensus that has grown across the high-cost Nordic welfare states out of the realisation that small, export-dependent economies can ill afford polarization and policy stagnation.
Nowhere is that consensus under such risk as in Finland, called “the sick man of Europe” by Stubb and now facing the same dilemma as many other eurozone economies of how to promote growth while also pursuing fiscal austerity.
Having long lectured southern European countries such as Greece on tackling their problems, Finland is belatedly coming to reform itself.
The demise of Nokia’s phone business and the electronics industry has shaved 3 percent off Finnish GDP since 2007, with the shrinking wood industry cutting another 0.75 percent, according to Organisation for Economic Development and Co-operation (OECD) economists.
Economic crisis in Russia, a close trade partner, has cut another 1.5 percent off Finnish output in the past three years, they say.
This year, Finland has lost its “triple-A” credit rating.
The European Commission has warned Helsinki about its rising debt and budget deficit, although last year the shortfall was equal to 2.7 percent of GDP, within the EU limit.
Still, public spending is 58 percent of GDP, the highest in the OECD group of developed economies. Exports remain 20 percent below their peak reached in 2007 before the global crisis erupted.
Resistance to austerity is considerable. In the past few months, parts of Helsinki have been brought to a standstill by protesting farmers driving tractors, while thousands of pensioners and students have also taken to streets.
Selin described the preliminary labor deal as “the lesser of two evils,” but said: “I have never seen the consensus model under such pressure. I have never seen so many demonstrations.”
“It’s not very Finnish,” she added.
NO REVOLUTION, YET
Stubb acknowledges no one wants to bear the brunt of the reforms.
“There is consensus in Finland that we need to turn the tide of debt, but there is clearly no consensus on where we do those cuts,” he said.
He made clear the government dislikes “revolution” — forcing through reforms that could polarize society.
“We decided that we’ll go through evolution, a bit by bit, but ... you have to be pretty sure that you meet those targets, otherwise at the end of the day you’ll have to go for the revolution,” he said.
Planned budget spending cuts would save 4 billion euros (US$4.5 billion) by 2019, equal to 2 percent of GDP. Social and health reforms would cut 3 billion euros, or 1.5 percent of GDP, according to the OECD.
Stubb has warned that if the labor reforms are watered down when unions and employers negotiate the final deal, the government could try to force through more radical cuts.
Sipila and Stubb have to walk a political tightrope on each of the three reforms, facing infighting within the three-party center-right coalition government and voters’ anger with planned spending cuts from education to child benefits.
Critics say Stubb is part of the problem.
Many Finns are wary of the extrovert and social media-savvy politician, mistrusting his image as a right-wing ideologue. He even faces a possible challenge to his party leadership.
Stubb’s cherished labor deal cuts to the heart of Finnish welfare.
If he gets his way, employees might work an extra 24 hours a year for no extra pay, but with increased pension contributions. Beloved benefits, such as a 50 percent bonus on monthly pay in the summer holidays, might be trimmed.
CLUELESS ON GROWTH
“Finland has lost its values,” said Arto Annila, a physics professor who was among 75 academics at Helsinki University to be made redundant.
Aged 53, it was the first time he has lost his job.
“Before you had a sense these were jobs for life,” he said.
Anger with these cuts — altogether about 980 jobs are going from the university’s staff — has helped the opposition center-left Social Democratic Party (SDP) rise to top in polls.
They advocate less austerity and more investment.
“Europe has generally done too much cutting,” said Sanna Marin, 30-year-old SDP vice chairwoman, who warns the coalition could fall before its term ends in 2019.
Her hometown suffers 18 percent unemployment.
“I think we have the fiscal room to invest,” she said.
However, few economists see any magic wand to boost growth, given how few new industries are making up for weakness of Finland’s electronic and forestry exports.
“We are all clueless on how to get long-term economic growth,” Helsinki University professor of public finances Markus Jantti said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath