Making the case for Bernie
This is a response to Joshua Chengyung Fu’s letter (Letter to Sanders supporters, p.8, March 19).
Fu writes that some US Democratic presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders supporters, or “Bernie Bros,” have said they would not vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton.
There is no such thing as the “Bernie Bros.” The “Bernie Bros” myth began with just two tweets from two individual users. One of the tweets cited comes from someone who is not even a Sanders supporter.
Fu is also concerned that US Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump might become president.
If you are concerned about Trump then vote for Sanders, because the polls indicate that Sanders would beat Trump in the US presidental election.
Finally, Fu says that Clinton and Sanders supporters have the same goals.
We do not.
Clinton wants to expand US President Barack Obama’s healthcare reforms — known as “Obamacare” — to more people.
Sanders wants to make healthcare available to everyone, just as it is in Taiwan, Canada, Europe and Japan.
Clinton wants to make studying at university less expensive.
Sanders wants to make it free just, as it is in England (sic), France, Germany and Scandinavia.
According to polls, the US states due to vote next all favor Sanders. Sanders is set to win the nomination and the presidency.
To think that the choice of Clinton is inevitable, that Sanders is too liberal and that the US is not ready for a “socialist” president is similar to saying that in 2008 Clinton was the inevitable choice and that Obama was too liberal and the US was not ready for a black president.
My fellow Americans, please register to vote at the American Institute in Taiwan, then vote for Sanders.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at a ceremony on July 30 officially commissioned China’s BeiDou-3 satellite navigation system. The constellation of satellites, which is now fully operational, was completed six months ahead of schedule. Its deployment means that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is now in possession of an autonomous, global satellite navigation system to rival the US’ GPS, Russia’s Glonass and the EU’s Galileo. Although Chinese officials have repeatedly sought to reassure the world that BeiDou-3 is primarily a civilian and commercial platform, US and European military experts beg to differ. Teresa Hitchens, a senior research associate at the University of
Taiwan’s rampant thesis and dissertation plagiarism has reduced the value of degrees, bringing the academic system’s public credibility to the brink of collapse. Data published on Retraction Watch — a blog that reports on retractions of scientific papers — showed that 73 papers written by Taiwanese researchers were retracted from international journals between 2012 and 2016 due to fake peer reviews, the second-highest in the world behind China. Based on the size of the academic population, Taiwan was the highest in the world, making it academically a pirate nation. Academic fraud in Taiwan can be divided into several types: the listing of coauthors;