As the narrative of Taiwanese history develops, much will no doubt be written about this period. Certainly, as president-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) prepares for her inauguration and a full transition of power to her party, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), a hopeful spirit pervades.
For, unlike when her DPP predecessor, Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), became president, Tsai is to take office having the support of a DPP that now possesses a clear and already installed majority in the Legislative Yuan.
It is the first time such a change of power has happened in Taiwan and it might cause some to declare, with a sigh of relief, that it has been a long time in coming. Others might examine the numerous instances that contributed to this change.
As a result, when all is said and done, the watchword will be that in Taiwan, the worm has finally turned. However, has it turned far enough?
“The worm has turned.” The very phrase carries an enigmatic quality of its own; it is a quality that promotes speculation as to both its full meaning and intent.
Historically, one of the earliest references to these words is in the Proverbs of John Heywood (1546): “Tread on a worm and it will turn.”
The phrase appears again in Shakespeare’s Henry VI, Part 3 (1592). It has continued to be used even by contemporary writer Agatha Christie.
The present day meaning of “the worm has turned” is a reversal of fortune, particularly one which favors underdogs or where people who had endured bullying refuse to accept it any longer and they react in opposition. The docile no longer stand by and endure injustice; instead they set about to give some form of payback. The human spirit reacts to tyranny.
In this regard, some pundits examine, and marvel, at how Taiwanese were able to resist and overcome both martial law and a one-party state. However, others question why it took Taiwanese so long to do so.
Whatever the situation, the signs that the worm has turned are all around. Most recent is the citing of the opposition DPP victories in the November 2014 nine-in-one elections and the victory of independent mayoral candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) over the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Sean Lien (連勝文) in traditionally pan-blue Taipei.
These signs continue as people grow courage. Today, people do not hesitate to recommend name changes of schools and institutions named for Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙). Such names now bring to mind the oppressive memory of the past.
In regards to Sun and his portrait worship, it is not necessarily a question of his worth in China, but whether he should be considered a founding father of democracy in Taiwan. If schools bear the names of democratic heroes, should they not be names of Taiwanese who long pushed for reform and freedom? Should they not be the names of those who went to prison and shed their blood for Taiwan?
These are all positive signs indicating that the worm has turned. Despite all of this, there are other signs that the metaphoric worm has not turned far enough.
The confiscation of documents by the Military Security Brigade from a private individual without a search warrant brings back memories of the White Terror era.
Vestiges and remnants of the one-party state regime still remain in other circles, such as the need for transitional justice and to change laws regarding documents describing criminal actions and names of those involved in the White Terror era, which cannot be opened.
Opening these sealed documents is illegal to allegedly protect the privacy of those mentioned, even if they did commit crimes.
There is also the matter of police abuse of power, such as putting down the Sunflower movement in 2014; things are not yet at the proper state of a democratic nation with rule of law.
There is a culture of corruption in politics. For example, Tainan City Council Speaker Lee Chuan-chiao (李全教) of the KMT was elected after bribing several DPP city councilors for their votes.
A double irony exists here. Those DPP councilors had just been elected by the citizens to represent their party’s values and yet, they accepted “bribes from the enemy.” Corruption is not limited to any one side.
Looking at the Legislative Yuan, during the vote for the Social Welfare and Environmental Hygiene Committee, DPP Legislator Yang Yao (楊曜) made an “error” and voted for himself. This allowed the minority KMT to gain a disproportionate number of committee convener seats and opened the question of whether Yang had accepted any money under the table.
Returning to the origins of the phrase, the worm has turned, in Shakespeare’s Henry VI, Part 3, some suggest that the worm is a reference to a dragon, but what they ignore is the context of the speech.
In that situation, Lord Clifford is giving a warning to Henry that once power has been gained and change is underway, the job should be finished. Lord Clifford is warning Henry that if things are not settled and false leniency is given, matters will return to what they were before. Henry must finish the job.
As Tsai prepares to take over the presidency, she will have much on her plate; priority no doubt needs to be given to the economy and Taiwan’s security. However, transitional justice has not yet been served and stolen state assets and many other issues are unresolved.
Tsai should seek alliances with groups represented by the New Power Party, the Taiwan Association of University Professors, the Taiwan Association for Human Rights and the Judicial Reform Foundation and others. Task forces can be organized to take on these matters. The nation has plenty of researchers who can be assigned to these and other unresolved matters.
The time has come to finish the job. This is not the time to exult in a weak or shallow victory. The worm has turned, but it needs to turn further.
Jerome Keating is a writer based in Taipei.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing