Footage of a man handing bananas to two naked men in the middle of an Amazonian river went viral in late June 2014. At the time, the Brazilians claimed it was a once in a generation event — that the moment of “first contact” was caught on camera. These were some of the last so-called “uncontacted” peoples left on the planet — men and women who live with no direct contact with the outside world. Experts suggest there are perhaps 70 such groupings left, numbering anything from 2,000 to 3,000 people in total, nearly all of whom live in the headwaters of the Amazon.
The emergence of this group of 35 of the Sapanahua tribe in 2014 has raised serious questions about how we should approach these people. In making our film, First Contact: Lost Tribe of the Amazon, we not only got the first access to the 35 to find out why they made contact and what their lives were like, but we went over the border to reserves in Peru, where we discovered a much bigger crisis.
For some reason, different uncontacted tribes and groupings are coming out on all sides of the reserves. The conventional, often correct, explanation is that they are being driven out by confrontations with illegal loggers and drug traffickers. However, there is evidence that something more fundamental is happening. What is certain is that the authorities are struggling to cope.
Illustration: Mountain people
In Brazil, the story of the 35 has been a success so far. The 14 men, nine women and 12 children are flourishing. They are living under the protection of FUNAI — the Brazilian department of indigenous peoples — at a camp they are creating four hours upriver from where they emerged. They seem to have overcome the most immediate danger: lack of immunity to our common diseases. It is now thought that simple influenza and the common cold, brought by outsiders from the Spanish conquistadores onwards, wiped out the vast majority of the indigenous peoples in the Amazon over the centuries.
So FUNAI flew in an expert doctor who vaccinated all 35, after gaining enough trust to persuade them that the injections were not designed to kill them. That trust is difficult. Misunderstandings abound. More than 100 FUNAI agents have been killed by tribes in the past decade. FUNAI proudly claims that this is the only time no one on either side has died after first contact, although some anthropologists and non-governmental organizations worry that members of the 35, when they disappear off hunting, could meet other members of the tribe and pass on deadly germs.
In their new home, where they continue to hunt and live much as they did before, the 35 have quickly adapted to the advantages of clothing, machetes and pots and pans. One of the women loves her flip-flops, while a nine-year-old boy, Curi Curi, happily seized our stills camera and within 10 minutes was producing photographs. They may well be what we once were, but they quickly can become like us. For good or bad.
In the desire to protect, it is amazing what we invest in these men and women. When the team first traveled down the rivers for more than a week to meet them, we felt as if we were crossing a time barrier. Here were people untouched by our rapacious civilization. Here were people who might tell us something profound about ourselves. Do they hold some profound ancient wisdoms we have lost? Some understanding of what we are as human beings? Or is such an idea simply an expression of our guilt?
While with them we discovered that it was a confrontation with armed men deep in the rainforest that finally drove them out. There had been a massacre in which fathers and mothers had been killed. The ones who first emerged were young and incredibly brave to seek peaceful contact with “the whites” who have always brought them death.
Their leader, Xina, told us that his parents always talked about how “the whites had always wanted to kill us.” Indeed a few days with the FUNAI anthropologists made clear that these rivers are not quite so untouched as they seem; nor were these tribes quite so isolated. They were almost certainly refugees from the horror that was the rubber boom of the early 20th century, when tribes that did not agree to work as slaves were hunted down and exterminated. These were the ones who ran away. And have stayed away until now.
What we also discovered from them, and also from others when we traveled south into Peru, was that they are not living in some prelapsarian Eden, innocent and untouched by the burdens of modern life. They continue to live in an almost constant state of terror. And fear. Fear of both their own world and fear of the outside.
It is a toxic mix: It turns out they are scared of snakes and jaguars, don’t like sleeping naked in the storms and think thunderstorms are the work of the gods.
And they do know about the outside world. They watch it, often silently. They see the clothes, the axes and the houses. And they want them, so it emerges they are regularly stealing and raiding. And that creates the next stage level of fear — because often when they put on the clothes they fall ill and sometimes die. And of course they cannot understand why.
For the past generation, the established policy has been to create vast reserves for the tribes, into which outsiders are not permitted, and not to contact them when they are seen or they approach. This policy provides some element of protection against the multinational oil, gas and mining companies which, like the first Spaniards, see the rainforests as the new frontier.
Indeed as recently as 10 years ago, the Peruvian government and its commercial friends ridiculed environmentalists and groups such as Survival International, which attempt to protect the interests of indigenous peoples in the Amazon. The government said there were no uncontacted peoples in Peru, so there was no need to protect them or close off their lands.
In the past couple of years the uncontacted have been unconsciously taking advantage of the policy. Local indigenous tribes, long part of the Peruvian and Brazilian state, have been lectured on how they should run away and escape if ever approached. They are told they will be prosecuted if they attack or even retaliate. As a result, the uncontacted feel able to walk into villages, particularly when the men are away. There is a genuine sense of crisis in some regions on the edge of the reserve.
In November 2014, the Peruvian border community of Monte Salvado, on the east of the reserve, was evacuated when a force of 150 people from the Mashco-Piro tribe, armed to the teeth, appeared on the other side of the river. What were they doing there? The lack of communication makes it almost impossible to tell. Such a grouping was not the result of a confrontation with loggers or traffickers, who have been cleared out of the area. When we traveled back with the villagers, some promised they would fight if the Mashco appeared like that again.
To the south, across the Manu reserve, the confrontation has turned to real violence with the murder of a young man in his village of Shipiatari. Here a much smaller group of Mashco-Piro has been drawn to a riverbank, which is used by commercial traffic, including tourists on their way to some of the finest jungle lodges in the world. A local evangelist has been visiting them trying to save their souls.
The Peruvian Ministry of Culture is struggling to cope and is for the first time breaking its no-contact code. It is keen to prevent any further violence between the Mashco-Piro and the local people, and has created a post along the river, which not only prevents tourist boats stopping to gawp, but also has a doctor.
We witnessed the first time the doctor went over to treat a woman, who had been attacked by an anteater. The government hopes that such contact will build some trust, though it fears the possible passing on of germs at the same time, which might undermine that trust.
The mantra must clearly remain that these men and women should only come out if they choose to. However, if it is true that fear is the dominant reality of these people’s lives, is our overwhelming desire to protect them as they are the right way to continue?
Surely the Brazilians and Peruvians, now armed with the medical ability to quickly inoculate them, should be working out how to help them, to ensure their survival as they continue to emerge. Unless they do, there is a real chance of violent confrontation and another tragedy in the Amazon.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath