The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential primary in June last year saw a series of attempts to prevent former deputy legislative speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) — considered by some as the initial “brick” thrown to kick-start the primary — from running for president, specifically through a “brick-blocking” clause. The party’s chairperson by-election again sees a series of actions from within the party aimed at excluding Hung from power.
The KMT’s Leninist party structure, with all of the internal contradictions that this framework entails, accounts in some way for the increasingly deep divisions within the party. Indeed, a civil war is now inevitable between the two major factions — a local faction and a pro-China faction led by the Huang Fu-hsing (黃復興) military veterans’ branch.
It seems that the KMT has never gotten used to the idea of democracy in Taiwan. The party, with the Huang Fu-hsing branch forming its backbone, considers itself the legitimate ruler of China and the rightful successor of the Qing Dynasty. Anyone wanting to take the helm of the party needs the support of the Huang Fu-hsing branch.
The local faction, on the other hand, well-versed in the art of playing second fiddle to its pro-China rival, seems happy serving only in a secondary role. They know they are dependent on the other faction.
After the KMT’s landslide defeat in last month’s presidential and legislative elections, it is now apparent that no one can fix the deep divide between these two factions. The KMT is destined to break apart, regardless of whether Hung wins the chairmanship.
Six people have requested registration forms for the KMT by-election, but it is really just going to be a battle between Hung and KMT Acting Chairperson Huang Min-hui (黃敏惠) — whose sympathies lie with the local faction — as the other candidates have little chance of winning.
The local faction, which has previously worked on “brick-blocking,” is now busy devising a new “Hung-blocking” plan to stop her from being elected. While the pro-China faction would not allow them to win, the veteran-backed clique is itself faced with a dilemma: If it cannot countenance an attempt to “localize” the party, it runs the risk of ending up like the New Party.
The rift within the party was only made more apparent when, at the last minute, Huang picked up a registration form and former Taipei mayor and KMT vice chairman Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) backed out of the race. The local faction’s plan to block Hung could never really have worked unless they found a leader willing to run against Hung and Hau.
In many ways, Huang is just like former legislative speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平). Both are meek and compliant. When the KMT needed a Taiwanese puppet to look good, Hung became the party’s vice chairperson. When considering its options to compete against Hung, the local faction also tried convincing Vice President Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) to run in the by-election, but to no avail. KMT Legislator Apollo Chen (陳學聖) has been another option, but he does not seem competent enough. Huang, as the ultimate second fiddle, had to throw her hat into the ring.
Apart from their gender, Huang and Hung have little in common. If Hung wins, the local faction is likely to leave the KMT. If Huang wins, although her victory would be a major breakthrough for the local faction, the pro-China faction would still be a major headache. Regardless of the outcome of the by-election, the party is bound to become more divided.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Yu-an Tu
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing