When Burkinabe anti-terrorism commander Evrard Somda arrived with 20 men to start a fight-back against Muslim militants holed up in a smart hotel, his first decision was to seal off the area and throw away the rule book.
His training in France, Kenya, Senegal and elsewhere taught him he should be trying to make contact with the hostage takers. A quick glance at the horror before him was enough to know this would not work.
Cars blazed in the street, bursts of gunfire echoed from the Splendid Hotel and bodies were strewn across the terrace of Cappuccino, a cafe-restaurant across the road popular for its European menu and free Wi-Fi.
“They wanted to kill the maximum number of people and for them, it wasn’t a problem to die,” Somda, who arrived on the scene at 8:30pm, told reporters in the most detailed account yet of the Jan. 15 assault.
However, Somda realized his men could not simply storm the five-floor hotel for fear of accidentally killing civilians.
“We couldn’t just do what we wanted. We were obliged to take account of the life of the clients inside the hotel and avoid opening fire on them,” he said.
In the event, it would be nine hours before the three attackers were cornered in the nearby Bush Taxi restaurant. They fired on a brown troop carrier at the crossroads before a machine gunner perched in the vehicle’s turret shot them dead.
By then, 29 civilians from at least seven countries were dead in an attack that stamped the imprint of Muslim militancy on West Africa well beyond the previous flashpoints of Mali and northeast Nigeria.
Officials have not yet been able to determine whether al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) and al-Mourabitoun, groups that claimed responsibility for both attacks, used a local militant cell or sent fighters from northern Mali.
What is clear is that the militants selected a target to inflict maximum damage on a country emerging from a democratic transition under Burkinabe President Roch Marc Kabore — the nation’s first new leader since 1987.
“The intention was to hurt foreigners. It is a place where you find a lot of foreigners. That explains why they attacked it,” Burkinabe Minister of Internal Security Simon Compaore said.
Another feature of the Ouagadougou attack is how much time the militants had.
AQIM even said the attackers made a telephone call to report to the group there were “many crusaders dead.”
A later statement monitored by the SITE Intelligence group included a photograph of three young black men in army fatigues and carrying weapons it said were used in the raid.
“I was sitting in front of my boutique. Three guys passed in front of me. The tallest had a long gun. When they got to the intersection he fired in the air and the other two went into Cappuccino,” said Saly Coulibaly, who saw the attack begin at about 7:30pm.
People inside the one-room restaurant and on the terrace had no chance. Amid the shattered glass, bullet holes and charred ruins were signs of an ordinary evening brutally interrupted.
A bottle of chilli oil to serve with pizza stood on one table. A half-finished bottle of red wine lay under another.
The attackers sprayed the restaurant with bullets, set fire to cars and motorbikes and then entered the Splendid Hotel opposite. From there, they fired on people in the street, including anyone trying to emerge from the restaurant.
About midnight, a witness saw a man shot as he tried to retrieve his car parked near the hotel.
He bled to death clutching his keys.
Shortly after his arrival on the scene, Somda placed armed observers in nearby buildings to determine the number of attackers, including a plain clothes officer hiding under a car.
He then withdrew to a hastily erected command post at a nearby government ministry now filling with US agents, French special forces and the army and police chiefs.
By 10pm, at least 60 gendarmes and police were ready to start a counter-attack alongside French special forces equipped, unlike their Burkinabe counterparts, with night-vision goggles.
Two factors delayed them. First, they received mistaken information there were 12 attackers, not three.
Second, they realized that if three teams simultaneously hit the Cappuccino, the Splendid Hotel and the nearby Yibi Hotel they risked opening fire on one another by accident.
They opted first for the Splendid Hotel, the ground floor of which was on fire. Troops went room-by-room freeing dozens of people, a process that took most of the night.
At least one door was booby-trapped with a grenade and they did not know where the militants might be hiding, Somda said.
Many guests refused to open their doors, fearing a trick.
In the end it turned out all the attackers had withdrawn.
Next, security forces and the fire brigade went to the Cappuccino, which had been torched.
In the Yibi Hotel they found bullet casings to show the militants had been there, but again no sign of the men.
They were finally located at the Bush Taxi restaurant when the hidden security officers shot at them and they returned fire.
It then took several more hours to secure the site because of fears other militants might be hiding nearby.
In the aftermath, the grimmest scene was at the Cappuccino, where bodies were charred beyond recognition.
Only one person was pulled out alive, a woman from Burkina Faso, too traumatized to speak.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath