During election campaigns, candidates come under scrutiny not only for their policies and platforms, but also their moral character, trustworthiness, education, and financial and other assets. As long as it is not an unsubstantiated rumor or evidence fabricated to vilify a candidate, this is a legitimate part of any campaign.
However, in an attempt to the shift the focus away from allegations that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) vice presidential candidate Jennifer Wang (王如玄) engaged in speculative transactions of military apartments, the KMT has attacked Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), accusing her of purchasing and selling land in a rezoned area in Taipei’s Neihu District (內湖) and earning NT$180 million (US$5.45 million).
It is not difficult to understand why the KMT is doing this, although it is questionable if it will have any effect.
There are three aspects to this issue.
First, information transparency versus non-transparent activities: On Jan. 15, 1985, the Taipei City Government announced detailed plans for building a light industry zone in Neihu. This information was open and transparent, with the government banning land transfers, division and construction beginning on Aug. 27, 1988.
On March 1, Tsai purchased 271 ping (896m2) of land, which was transferred to her name on April 15. In what way is this timing problematic?
Compare this with the conversion of veterans’ villages into military housing units: From tearing down the old buildings to completing the new military housing units and distributing them through a lottery process, the process is rife with opportunities for plotting and scheming. Not even the soldiers in the old veterans’ villages had any insight and they had no choice but to do as the Ministry of National Defense said. However, this complete lack of transparency gives those who are extremely resourceful and well-connected a chance to manipulate the process.
Second, investment versus speculation: Buying a property and holding it for a long time before selling it is investing. However, buying and then selling it within a short period of time is speculating.
Tsai bought 15 plots of land — on average only 18 ping each — for a total of 271 ping which, after rezoning, was reduced to 149 ping in 1988, and sold them all in 1997 — nine years later. Is this investment or speculation?
Wang, on the other hand, bought 12 military housing units, sold two of them less than a year after they were purchased, and sold the others between one and three years after they were bought. Is this investment or speculation?
Wang keeps saying that her moral standards are impeccable, but I am not sure everyone agrees with that.
Finally, there is the issue of legality. As long as one has money — and this, of course, includes Wang — one can legally buy and sell rezoned land. However, can anyone who has money — still, including Wang, of course — buy military housing units prior to or during the lockup period in which trading is prohibited?
Of the 12 units that Wang has admitted to trading, not one was bought before the five-year lockup period expired. This raises several questions about insider information, insider trading and illegal actions.
Buying and selling real estate legally is not a problem, regardless of how much profit you make. However, obtaining real estate from unclear sources or through improper means is wrong.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath