Several days ago, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Eric Chu (朱立倫) issued a pledge during an event in New Taipei City’s Sindian District (新店), saying that if elected, he would do all he could to promote tourism, adding that it is possible that the number of tourists visiting Taiwan could reach 20 million or 30 million per year.
This is the first economic plan that he has presented the public with since he was nominated as presidential candidate. Chu’s tourism plan made people realize that the “One Taiwan” he has been talking about in his promotional materials means that he is following in the footsteps of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) by turning Taiwan into a resort island for Chinese tourists.
Japan is also promoting tourism and its goal is to welcome 20 million visitors by the time Tokyo hosts the Olympic Games in 2020. Japan covers an area of 377,000km2, which is 10 times the size of Taiwan, and it offers stunning scenery to tourists.
Based on Chu’s standards, Japan should be aiming for 200 million visitors by 2020, but everyone can see how preposterous that sounds. Even Thailand — whose economy is built on tourism and has an area 13 times the size of Taiwan, with a population of 67 million — receives 26 million tourists per year.
The Japanese and Thai prime ministers know that the tourism industry only makes up a part of their GDP and that there are many other important industrial sectors in need of talented people and resources. During the Democratic Progressive Party’s term in government, Taiwan received about 2 million tourists per year, which is about the same level as the 20 million that Japan aims for in 2020. That results in a high quality travel experience.
However, after the Ma administration started bringing in Chinese tourists, the quality of the experience at Sun Moon Lake, Taroko Gorge and other locations has deteriorated, and the tourism industry has become a low-margin, low-quality industry.
Ma and Chu’s “sea of tourists” tactic is a step in Ma’s strategy to bring about eventual unification with China. The goal is to revamp the economic structures Taiwan developed as leader of the four Asian tigers and turn it into a marginalized island to serve the pleasures of the Chinese elite. They have done this by signing the eventual colonization and unification framework agreement — also known as the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) — and the service trade agreement to suppress economic growth. It seems, this year, it would be difficult to achieve an economic growth of 1 percent, but this is in line with Ma’s desire to bring about the complete restoration of Zhonghua minzu (中華民族) — the Chinese nation.
Ma and Chu have recently joined hands in promoting the work they feel remains unfinished, and it is of the utmost importance that all Taiwanese are aware of this. Although they have been in power for eight years, and although the ECFA framework has allowed them to move Taiwan’s main productive industries to China, the high-tech semiconductor and IC design industries that remain in Taiwan as a result of the “no haste, be patient” policy are still doing well and have become important economic pillars.
Last year, Beijing set up a semiconductor fund to the tune of 120 billion yuan (US$18.58 billion) and it is using state capital to acquire overseas semiconductor companies. It is now targeting Taiwan.
Not long ago, China’s state-backed Tsinghua Unigroup planned to take a share in South Korea’s SK Hynix Inc, but in less than a day, Hynix had given them a slap in the face.
However, the Ministry of Economic Affairs is trying to ingratiate itself with Beijing, welcoming it with open arms. In addition to encouraging United Microelectronics Corp and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co to set up production in China, the ministry also wants to allow Chinese investors to invest in the Taiwanese stock market.
It is as if it were holding a clearance sale in an attempt to let Chinese investors take control of Taiwan’s main industries before the Ma administration has to step down, while turning Taiwan into a resort island dedicated to serving Chinese tourists.
What is even more worrying is that Taiwanese are not reacting to Ma and Chu’s “Taiwanese auction”: Protesters are limited to a few members of the Taiwan Solidarity Union’s youth division and the Economic Democracy Union. This is the real crisis facing Taiwan.
Huang Tien-lin is a former advisory member of the National Security Council and a former Presidential Office adviser.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing