Fifty years ago today, as the American Association for the Advancement of Science highlighted, then-US president Lyndon Johnson’s Science Advisory Committee sent him a report titled Restoring the Quality of Our Environment.
The introduction to the report noted: Pollutants have altered on a global scale the carbon dioxide content of the air and the lead concentrations in ocean waters and human populations.
The report included a section on atmospheric carbon dioxide and climate change, written by prominent climate scientists Roger Revelle, Wallace Broecker, Charles Keeling, Harmon Craig and J. Smagorisnky.
Reviewing the document today, one cannot help but be struck by how well these scientists understood the mechanisms of Earth’s climate change 50 years ago.
The report said that within a few years, climate models would be able to reasonably project future global surface temperature changes.
In 1974, one of its authors, Wallace Broecker, did just that in a paper titled Climatic Change: Are We on the Brink of a Pronounced Global Warming?
His model only included the effects of carbon dioxide and his best estimates of natural climate cycles. It did not include the warming effects of other greenhouse gases, or the cooling effects of human aerosol pollution, but fortunately for Broecker, those two effects have roughly canceled each other out over the past 40 years.
Broecker’s model predicted the global warming anticipated by this year both from carbon pollution alone, and when including his best estimate of natural climate cycles. The climate model predictions from more than 40 years ago turned out to be remarkably accurate.
The 1965 report also debunked a number of myths that climate contrarians continue to repeat to this day. For example, the first section of the climate chapter is titled Carbon Dioxide from Fossil Fuels — the Invisible Pollutant.
Although the US Supreme Court ruled that carbon dioxide is a pollutant in a landmark 2007 case, many contrarians object to this description. Nevertheless, climate scientists realized a half century ago that human carbon emissions qualify as pollution due to the dangers they pose via climate change.
The report said that although carbon dioxide is an invisible “trace gas” — meaning it comprises a small percentage of the Earth’s atmosphere as a whole — it can nevertheless have significant impacts on the climate at these seemingly low levels.
As the scientists wrote: “Only about one two-thousandth of the atmosphere and one ten-thousandth of the ocean are carbon dioxide. Yet to living creatures, these small fractions are of vital importance Within a few short centuries, we are returning to the air a significant part of the carbon that was slowly extracted by plants and buried in the sediments during half a billion years.”
Contrarians today often repeat the myths that because carbon dioxide is invisible and only a trace gas, it cannot possibly cause significant climate change. This report demonstrates that scientists understood the greenhouse effect better 50 years ago than these contrarians do today.
The report documented the several different lines of evidence that prove the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide is entirely human-caused.
“We can conclude with fair assurance that at the present time, fossil fuels are the only source of CO2 being added to the ocean-atmosphere-biosphere system,” the report said.
This is yet another fact understood by climate scientists 50 years ago that some contrarian scientists, such as Roy Spencer and Judith Curry, continue to cast doubt upon to this day.
The report also projected how much the atmospheric carbon dioxide level would increase in the following decades.
Based on projected world energy requirements, the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (1956) has estimated an amount of fossil fuel combustion by the year 2000 that with our assumed partitions would give about a 25 percent increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide, compared with the amount present during the 19th century.
A 25 percent increase from pre-industrial levels would result in about 350 parts per million (ppm) of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
The UN underestimated the growth in fossil fuel combustion, because the actual carbon dioxide level in 2000 was 370ppm.
In addition to rising temperatures, the report discussed a variety of “other possible effects of an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide,” including melting of the Antarctic ice cap, rise of sea level, warming of sea water, increased acidity of fresh waters (which also applies to the danger of ocean acidification, global warming’s evil twin) and an increase in plant photosynthesis.
These climate scientists warned Johnson in 1965 not just of the dangers associated with human-caused global warming, but also that we might eventually have to consider geoengineering the climate to offset that warming and the risks that we are causing by inadvertently running a dangerous experiment with the Earth’s climate.
Through their worldwide industrial civilization, humanity are unwittingly conducting a vast geophysical experiment. Within a few generations they have been burning the fossil fuels that slowly accumulated in the earth over the past 500 million years.
The climatic changes that may be produced by the increased carbon dioxide content could be deleterious from the point of view of human beings. The possibilities of deliberately bringing about countervailing climatic changes therefore need to be thoroughly explored.
Fifty years later, the impending Paris international climate negotiations represent our last chance to heed the expert counsel about the dangers posed by human-caused climate change before we are fully committed to the deleterious consequences that climate scientists have been warning us about for a half century.
That is why more than 1,500 academics from around the world have signed an open letter asking world leaders and delegates at Paris to take vigorous action now to avoid a future of catastrophic global warming.
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
Chinese strongman Xi Jinping (習近平) hasn’t had a very good spring, either economically or politically. Not that long ago, he seemed to be riding high. The PRC economy had been on a long winning streak of more than six percent annual growth, catapulting the world’s most populous nation into the second-largest power, behind only the United States. Hundreds of millions had been brought out of poverty. Beijing’s military too had emerged as the most powerful in Asia, lagging only behind the US, the long-time leader on the global stage. One can attribute much of the recent downturn to the international economic
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a
Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) is to be Taiwan’s next representative to the US. Hsiao is well versed in international affairs and Taiwan-US relations. In her days as a student in the US, she was a member of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) and served as chief executive of the Democratic Progressive Party’s US mission. She is familiar with a broad spectrum of Taiwanese affairs in the US. FAPA hopes that Hsiao, after taking up her new post, would continue to deepen and normalize relations between Taiwan and the US, and that she would try to get a free-trade agreement