FAPA opposes Xi meeting
The Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) — a Taiwanese-American grassroots organization based in Washington — wants to express its deep concern about the sudden announcement that Taiwanese President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) are scheduled to meet in Singapore [today].
That the plans for the meeting were kept under wraps until the last minute is symptomatic of the undemocratic “black box” approach the Ma government has been following for years. The lack of transparency in governance was already evident when the Ma administration tried to push through the ill-fated service trade agreement in March last year and the changes in history textbooks earlier this year. In both cases, the matters led to large-scale protests.
The short notice for the meeting also flies in the face of the “no surprises” approach President Ma promised — in particular vis-a-vis the US — when conducting policy on cross-strait issues: His announcement on Nov. 7 that he would meet Xi in Singapore is a big surprise.
What are the main drivers prompting this move by Ma?
First, he is trying to salvage his legacy. As his standing in the polls is way down, he feels he needs to do something drastic to polish his image. He is generally considered a down-and-out, has-been politician. Very few people outside his own little circle believe in him anymore.
Second, he is trying to turn the tide in the Jan. 16 presidential election, where the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), with its presidential candidate, Eric Chu (朱立倫), is still way behind Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in the opinion polls.
Chu’s manipulation of the ouster of the KMT’s previous candidate, Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), did not earn him much credit and his ratings have stayed at around the same level as Hung’s.
Third, he wants to pin Tsai down on the cross-strait issue and restrict her future options by agreeing with Xi that cross-strait “stability” cannot be guaranteed unless she embraces the so-called “1992 consensus.”
Many see the “1992 consensus” as a slippery slope toward unification. They want to keep all options open for the nation, and want Taiwanese to decide their future openly and freely.
In FAPA’s view, “peace and stability” is only artificial, as it is predicated on the fact that Ma has given China the impression that Taiwan is inexorably drifting in its direction. As is clear from opinion polls that is simply not the case: Taiwanese prefer democracy and freedom.
FAPA believes that:
First, the timing and the manner this meeting came about is not conducive to a balanced and responsible debate on future relations with China. With his approach, Ma is attempting to pre-empt a DPP government from exploring directions that would provide better guarantees for Taiwan’s future as a free and democratic nation.
Second, it is inappropriate for a lame-duck president to engage in such a meeting only two months before presidential and legislative elections. There is obviously no consensus in the nation on how to move forward on cross-strait relations and Ma does not have any mandate. On the contrary, his pro-China policies have been soundly rejected in both last year’s nine-in-one elections and in recent opinion polls.
Third, a truly fruitful and productive meeting between leaders from the two sides can only be held in due time, after the nation has reached a consensus on future cross-strait relations in a transparent and open process.
Formosan Association for Public Affairs
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose