FAPA opposes Xi meeting
The Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) — a Taiwanese-American grassroots organization based in Washington — wants to express its deep concern about the sudden announcement that Taiwanese President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) are scheduled to meet in Singapore [today].
That the plans for the meeting were kept under wraps until the last minute is symptomatic of the undemocratic “black box” approach the Ma government has been following for years. The lack of transparency in governance was already evident when the Ma administration tried to push through the ill-fated service trade agreement in March last year and the changes in history textbooks earlier this year. In both cases, the matters led to large-scale protests.
The short notice for the meeting also flies in the face of the “no surprises” approach President Ma promised — in particular vis-a-vis the US — when conducting policy on cross-strait issues: His announcement on Nov. 7 that he would meet Xi in Singapore is a big surprise.
What are the main drivers prompting this move by Ma?
First, he is trying to salvage his legacy. As his standing in the polls is way down, he feels he needs to do something drastic to polish his image. He is generally considered a down-and-out, has-been politician. Very few people outside his own little circle believe in him anymore.
Second, he is trying to turn the tide in the Jan. 16 presidential election, where the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), with its presidential candidate, Eric Chu (朱立倫), is still way behind Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in the opinion polls.
Chu’s manipulation of the ouster of the KMT’s previous candidate, Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), did not earn him much credit and his ratings have stayed at around the same level as Hung’s.
Third, he wants to pin Tsai down on the cross-strait issue and restrict her future options by agreeing with Xi that cross-strait “stability” cannot be guaranteed unless she embraces the so-called “1992 consensus.”
Many see the “1992 consensus” as a slippery slope toward unification. They want to keep all options open for the nation, and want Taiwanese to decide their future openly and freely.
In FAPA’s view, “peace and stability” is only artificial, as it is predicated on the fact that Ma has given China the impression that Taiwan is inexorably drifting in its direction. As is clear from opinion polls that is simply not the case: Taiwanese prefer democracy and freedom.
FAPA believes that:
First, the timing and the manner this meeting came about is not conducive to a balanced and responsible debate on future relations with China. With his approach, Ma is attempting to pre-empt a DPP government from exploring directions that would provide better guarantees for Taiwan’s future as a free and democratic nation.
Second, it is inappropriate for a lame-duck president to engage in such a meeting only two months before presidential and legislative elections. There is obviously no consensus in the nation on how to move forward on cross-strait relations and Ma does not have any mandate. On the contrary, his pro-China policies have been soundly rejected in both last year’s nine-in-one elections and in recent opinion polls.
Third, a truly fruitful and productive meeting between leaders from the two sides can only be held in due time, after the nation has reached a consensus on future cross-strait relations in a transparent and open process.
Formosan Association for Public Affairs
Washington
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath