It sounds like 21st century China: a consumer’s paradise where glass skyscrapers race toward the heavens, Porsche convertibles cruise the streets and towering billboards advertise Gucci and Prada.
In fact, some believe this is a vision of North Korea’s future if the country’s rulers resolve to follow the footsteps of their neighbors to the north.
While many experts view regime collapse as the most likely — and bloody — endgame for North Korean leader Kim Jong-un’s reign, one of the most optimistic scenarios is that North Korea might instead look to China’s experience of economic reform.
“That is the inevitable road that they have to take,” said Paik Hak-soon, the director of the Center for North Korean Studies at the Sejong Institute in Seoul, who believes Kim has already embarked on a gradual path of political — as well as economic — reform reminiscent of China and Vietnam in the 1970s and 1980s.
“The die is cast. There is no way of returning,” Paik said.
Officials and academics in South Korea repeatedly evoke late Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) — a charismatic pragmatist who led China out of the chaos of the Mao era and into a new period of explosive economic growth — as a potential inspiration for North Korea’s young leader.
In the late 1970s, Deng masterminded Beijing’s “reform and opening up,” a period of economic modernization that allowed hundreds of millions of Chinese to lift themselves from poverty and helped make their country the world’s second-largest economy.
Seoul’s Yonsei University political scientist Moon Chung-in said Pyongyang was only too aware of the need to embark on a similar process.
“They want to do it. They are damn smart. They think about the regime’s survival 24 hours a day, 365 days [a year],” he said.
However, Moon cautioned against outsiders pushing North Korea toward imitating China.
“If you really want to change North Korea don’t use the word change. If you really want to push North Korea in the direction of opening and reform then never use ‘opening’ and ‘reform,’” he said. “They have all the examples, all the models. But the very moment [someone says]: ‘Kim Jong-un is adopting the Deng Xiaoping model,’ they will stop. If they adopt the Deng Xiaoping model you simply say: ‘That is the Kim Jong-un model. It is a good model, it is doing well.’”
Chung Chong-wook, who was Seoul’s ambassador to Beijing from 1996 to 1998, is another for whom Chinese history provides a source of optimism. Chung said the two countries were different, but, asked if Deng could be a role model for Kim Jong-un, he replied: “I hope so.”
The former diplomat said he already saw signs that Kim was moving away from the “military-first” policy adopted by his father, former North Korean leader Kim Jong-il.
“Under Kim Jong-un of course the nuclear priority is [still] there, but the economy is also being emphasized,” Chung said. “I think that Kim Jong-un, as time goes on, will have to rely on the economy to support his legitimacy as the leader. I do not think that that will happen right away, it will be the same at least for many, many years to come. But the change, the shift is [there].”
Andrei Lankov, author of The Real North Korea: Life and Politics in the Failed Stalinist Utopia, said it was his dream to see Pyongyang follow Beijing’s footsteps and become a developmental dictatorship .
However, Lankov said Kim Jong-un would be unwise to stick too closely to Deng’s rulebook for reform.
For a start, North Korea’s leader would have to be far more repressive than the Chinese leader, who ordered the brutal Tiananmen crackdown, but nevertheless presided over a major relaxation of individual freedoms compared with the Mao era.
The staggering economic gulf between North and South Korea would likely spark a popular revolt in the North if Kim relaxed his grip, Lankov said.
“If he becomes Deng Xiaoping he is going to be killed. He needs to be a cross between Deng Xiaoping and Stalin. He has to be very trigger-happy because South Korea is so damn successful. Deng Xiaoping, yes, but significantly more repressive,” he said.
Paik said he believed Kim Jong-un had already set his country’s course toward reform and opening up, pointing to the special economic zones he had established since taking power in December 2011.
“The key word in North Korean society is change, change, change,” Paik said.
Whether Kim has already begun this transformation into a Deng with North Korean characteristics remains unclear, but many believe he ultimately has little choice.
“Kim Jong-un could become like Deng Xiaoping,” one government adviser in Seoul said. “If not he might end up like [former Romanian leader] Ceausescu.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath