When the US Department of Justice arrested the chairman of Temple University’s physics department this spring and accused him of sharing sensitive US-made technology with China, prosecutors had what seemed like a damning piece of evidence: schematics of sophisticated laboratory equipment sent by the professor, Xi Xiaoxing (郗小星), to scientists in China.
Prosecutors said the schematics revealed the design of a device known as a pocket heater. The equipment is used in semiconductor research, and Xi had signed an agreement promising to keep its design a secret.
Months later, long after federal agents had led Xi away in handcuffs, independent experts discovered something wrong with the evidence at the heart of the department’s case: The blueprints were not for a pocket heater.
Illustration: Mountain People
Faced with sworn statements from leading scientists, including one of the inventors of the pocket heater, the department on Friday last week dropped all charges against Xi, a US citizen.
It was an embarrassing acknowledgment that prosecutors and FBI agents did not understand — and did not do enough to learn — the science at the heart of the case before bringing charges that jeopardized Xi’s career and left the impression that he was spying for China.
NOT A GAME
“I don’t expect them to understand everything I do,” Xi, 57, said in a telephone interview. “But the fact that they don’t consult with experts and then charge me? Put my family through all this? Damage my reputation? They shouldn’t do this. This is not a joke. This is not a game.”
The US faces an onslaught from outside hackers and inside employees trying to steal government and corporate secrets. US President Barack Obama’s strategy to combat it involves aggressive espionage investigations and prosecutions, as well as increased cyberdefenses.
However Xi’s case, coming on the heels of a similar case that was dismissed a few months ago in Ohio, raises questions about whether the department, in its rush to find Chinese spies, is ensnaring innocent US citizens of Chinese ancestry.
A spokeswoman for Zane Memeger, the US attorney in Philadelphia who brought the charges, did not elaborate on the decision to drop the case.
In court documents, the department said “additional information came to the attention of the government.”
The filing gives the government the right to file the charges again if it chooses. A spokesman for US Assistant Attorney General John Carlin, who is overseeing the crackdown on economic espionage, had no comment on whether department officials in Washington reviewed the case.
The science involved in Xi’s case is, by any measure, complicated. It involves the process of coating one substance with a very thin film of another.
RUSH TO JUDGEMENT
Xi’s lawyer, Peter Zeidenberg, said that despite the complexity, it appeared that the government never consulted experts before taking the case to a grand jury. As a result, prosecutors misconstrued the evidence, he said.
Zeidenberg, a partner in the Washington-based firm Arent Fox, represented both Xi and Sherry Chen, a US government hydrologist who was charged and later cleared in the Ohio case.
A long-time federal prosecutor, Zeidenberg said he understood that agents felt intense pressure to crack down on Chinese espionage, but the authorities in these cases appeared to have been too quick to assume their suspicions were justified.
Zeidenberg said that in Xi’s case, the authorities saw e-mails to scientists in China and assumed the worst. However, he said the e-mails represented the kind of international academic collaboration that governments and universities encourage. The technology discussed was not sensitive or restricted, he said.
“If he was Canadian-American or French-American, or he was from the UK, would this have ever even got on the government’s radar? I don’t think so,” Zeidenberg said.
The department sees a pernicious threat of economic espionage from China, and experts say Beijing has an official policy encouraging the theft of trade secrets. Prosecutors have charged Chinese workers in the US with stealing Boeing aircraft information, specialty seeds and even the pigment used to whiten Oreo cookie cream.
Other researchers and academics are being closely watched. The FBI is investigating a Chinese-American mapping expert who abruptly resigned from Ohio State University last year and disappeared while working with NASA, the Columbus Dispatch reported this week. In May, the department charged a Chinese professor and others with stealing acoustics equipment from US companies.
About a dozen FBI agents, some with guns drawn, stormed Xi’s home in the Philadelphia suburbs in May, searching his house just after dawn, he said. His two daughters and his wife watched the agents take him away in handcuffs on fraud charges.
“Unfortunately I think this is influenced by the politics of the time,” Xi said. “But I think it’s wrong. We Chinese-Americans, we contribute to the country, to the national security, to everything.”
Temple University put him on administrative leave and took away his title as chairman of the physics department. He was given strict rules about who at the school he could talk to. He said that made it impossible for him to continue working on a long-running research project that was nearing completion.
Xi, who arrived in the US in 1989 and is a naturalized citizen, was adamant that he was innocent. However, it was only when he and his lawyers reviewed the government’s evidence that they understood what had happened.
“When I read it, I knew that they were mixing things up,” Xi said.
EXPERT HELP
His lawyers contacted independent scientists and showed them the diagram the department said was the pocket heater. The scientists agreed it was not.
In a sworn affidavit, one engineer, Ward Ruby, said he was uniquely qualified to identify a pocket heater.
“I am very familiar with this device, as I was one of the co-inventors,” he said.
Last month, Zeidenberg delivered a presentation for prosecutors and explained the science. He gave them sworn statements from the experts and implored the department to consult with a physicist before taking the case any further.
Late on Friday afternoon, the department dropped the case “in the interests of justice.”
“We wish they had come to us with any concerns they had about professor Xi prior to indicting him, but at least they did listen,” Zeidenberg said.
Xi choked back tears as he described an ordeal that was agonizing for his family.
“I barely came out of this nightmare,” he said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing