Last year, it was South Korea. Now, it is Japan.
Yes, nation-bashing is now, apparently, a winning campaign strategy. At least for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
And this disturbing trend is showing no signs of abating.
Remarks made on Saturday by KMT presidential candidate Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) that “Taiwan will lose to Japan” if she does not win next year’s election reflect the latest in a set of statements that are likely to cause some head-scratching in both Taipei and Tokyo.
After all, is Japan not Taiwan’s second-largest trading partner? Is Japan not a key influence in Taiwan’s geostrategic position? Did President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) not recently say that Taiwan and Japan enjoy a “special partnership”?
So where is all this negativity coming from?
The answer is simple.
It reflects the KMT’s willingness to place politics above all else — even above the importance of Taiwan-Japan relations. More fundamentally, it shows that the KMT is not above expending what is in the nation’s best interests — having a strong, healthy relationship with Japan — in order to advance its own political agenda.
The implications of this trend feeds into a common criticism that in Taiwan, politics trumps all.
It sends a detrimental message to our important allies that anything and everything can be sacrificed and expended in the course of an election. That is not a message Taiwan can afford to be sending as it seeks to strengthen global relations.
Taiwan’s position in world order is premised on maintaining strong international relations. It is the foundation of what keeps Taiwan free and secure; and it is essential as to diversifying the economy.
This is the foundation of the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) foreign policy direction: That Taiwan should be building better and more engaging partnerships with global partners. It should be looking to find new opportunities to strengthen — not weaken — these relations.
That was the message DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) shared when she visited the US in June. It has also been Taiwan’s consistent message to the international community as well. This is a message that will not change based on the whims of an election campaign.
As for history?
History did not stop the US and Japan from building one of the strongest and most enduring alliances of the 20th century, and it certainly would not stop Taiwan from forging a vital and dynamic partnership with Japan.
Vincent Y. Chao is a deputy director of international affairs for the Democratic Progressive Party.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS