In response to the arrogance of the Ministry of Education, which refuses to withdraw its “micro-adjustments” to the high-school curriculum guidelines, students from nearly 300 high schools as well as members of educational and social groups surrounded the ministry on Wednesday evening in a determined display of their demands. Not only was this a rare sight, it could also be seen as advance notice of a new era.
A publication entitled Taiwan Youth (台灣青年) was founded in Tokyo almost a century ago, on July 16, 1920. Funded by several landlords, such as Tsai Hui-ju (蔡惠如) and Lin Hsien-tang (林獻堂), the magazine was published by a group of Taiwanese studying in Japan, including Tsai Pei-huo (蔡培火), Lin Cheng-lu (林呈祿) and Peng Hua-ying (彭華英).
By using the word “youth” in its name, the magazine showed an affinity with earlier organizations, such as Young Italy and Young China (少年中國) and publications such as the New Youth (新青年).
Later, the magazine was transformed into the publications Taiwan (台灣), Taiwan Minpao (台灣民報) and, finally, the Taiwan New Minpao (台灣新民報), serving as the main channel for publications related to the new literature and cultural movement in Taiwan, and a battlefield for the anti-Japanese culture movement.
In this era, young Taiwanese were outstanding as they shined in both cultural and political domains. Although the governments before and after World War II had a strict and conservative attitude toward national education, “Taiwan awareness” took root and sprouted in the educational domain following Taiwan’s first change in government in 2000. Hence, the high-school curriculum “micro-adjustments” that President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government has insisted on in recent years and that have caused a series of disputes, can be seen both as a transformation and continuance of the Chinese colonization of Taiwan’s educational system and as the last attack of a dying beast.
Regardless of how controversy over the “micro-adjustments” to the high-school curriculum ends, the issue has succeeded in motivating people in cultural circles, professors, writers, and high-school history and civil ethics teachers opposed to the adjustments to protest in public. Even senior-high and vocational school students are taking concrete action and joining the campaign to show their determination to safeguard educational autonomy, and that is an unexpected positive result.
What deserves people’s greater attention is that, apart from the past focus on political and economic issues, young Taiwanese have extended their focus of attention to environmental, media, educational and cultural issues. They have displayed a broader intellectual approach and vision than older generations. That being so, perhaps it is possible to optimistically conclude that a new era is undoubtedly coming; the door has already been kicked opened.
Na Su-phoh is a volunteer worker at the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Taiwan has lost Trump. Or so a former State Department official and lobbyist would have us believe. Writing for online outlet Domino Theory in an article titled “How Taiwan lost Trump,” Christian Whiton provides a litany of reasons that the William Lai (賴清德) and Donald Trump administrations have supposedly fallen out — and it’s all Lai’s fault. Although many of Whiton’s claims are misleading or ill-informed, the article is helpfully, if unintentionally, revealing of a key aspect of the MAGA worldview. Whiton complains of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s “inability to understand and relate to the New Right in America.” Many
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
Taiwan is to hold a referendum on Saturday next week to decide whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant, which was shut down in May after 40 years of service, should restart operations for as long as another 20 years. The referendum was proposed by the opposition Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and passed in the legislature with support from the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Its question reads: “Do you agree that the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should continue operations upon approval by the competent authority and confirmation that there are no safety concerns?” Supporters of the proposal argue that nuclear power
RSS