In response to the arrogance of the Ministry of Education, which refuses to withdraw its “micro-adjustments” to the high-school curriculum guidelines, students from nearly 300 high schools as well as members of educational and social groups surrounded the ministry on Wednesday evening in a determined display of their demands. Not only was this a rare sight, it could also be seen as advance notice of a new era.
A publication entitled Taiwan Youth (台灣青年) was founded in Tokyo almost a century ago, on July 16, 1920. Funded by several landlords, such as Tsai Hui-ju (蔡惠如) and Lin Hsien-tang (林獻堂), the magazine was published by a group of Taiwanese studying in Japan, including Tsai Pei-huo (蔡培火), Lin Cheng-lu (林呈祿) and Peng Hua-ying (彭華英).
By using the word “youth” in its name, the magazine showed an affinity with earlier organizations, such as Young Italy and Young China (少年中國) and publications such as the New Youth (新青年).
Later, the magazine was transformed into the publications Taiwan (台灣), Taiwan Minpao (台灣民報) and, finally, the Taiwan New Minpao (台灣新民報), serving as the main channel for publications related to the new literature and cultural movement in Taiwan, and a battlefield for the anti-Japanese culture movement.
In this era, young Taiwanese were outstanding as they shined in both cultural and political domains. Although the governments before and after World War II had a strict and conservative attitude toward national education, “Taiwan awareness” took root and sprouted in the educational domain following Taiwan’s first change in government in 2000. Hence, the high-school curriculum “micro-adjustments” that President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government has insisted on in recent years and that have caused a series of disputes, can be seen both as a transformation and continuance of the Chinese colonization of Taiwan’s educational system and as the last attack of a dying beast.
Regardless of how controversy over the “micro-adjustments” to the high-school curriculum ends, the issue has succeeded in motivating people in cultural circles, professors, writers, and high-school history and civil ethics teachers opposed to the adjustments to protest in public. Even senior-high and vocational school students are taking concrete action and joining the campaign to show their determination to safeguard educational autonomy, and that is an unexpected positive result.
What deserves people’s greater attention is that, apart from the past focus on political and economic issues, young Taiwanese have extended their focus of attention to environmental, media, educational and cultural issues. They have displayed a broader intellectual approach and vision than older generations. That being so, perhaps it is possible to optimistically conclude that a new era is undoubtedly coming; the door has already been kicked opened.
Na Su-phoh is a volunteer worker at the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
RSS