Taking a puff from a hookah and a sip from her beer, Thuy Truong, a 29-year-old tech entrepreneur in a black cocktail dress, pondered the question: What were her thoughts on the 40th anniversary of the fall of Saigon?
“Forty years ago?” she yelled over the body-rattling roar of nightclub music. “Who cares!”
Four decades after the victory of Communist forces, the soul of this city, still known locally as Saigon, seems firmly planted in the present. For the young and increasingly affluent, Saigon is a city that does not want to look back, loves having fun and perhaps most of all is voraciously capitalistic.
The apartment building where people clambered up an outdoor staircase to board a CIA helicopter in a chaotic rooftop evacuation, a scene captured in an iconic photograph, is now at the heart of a neighborhood filled with luxury shops selling US$1,000 Rimowa suitcases and US$2,000 Burberry suits.
A newly-paved walkway runs down the median of nearby Nguyen Hue Street, a magnet for teenagers on skateboards and in-line skaters who swoosh past a temporary display of photographs honoring a deceased cadre of the Communist Party. A statue of Ho Chi Minh, the Communist revolutionary leader, is sandwiched between a luxury hotel and a refurbished French colonial building that is soon to house a Brooks Brothers store.
Two-thirds of the Vietnamese population was born after the fall of Saigon and the reunification of Vietnam in 1975. Among the young there is gratefulness that they are coming of age now, when the country is at peace after so many centuries of wars, occupation and entanglements with foreign armies.
“I feel lucky that I was born a long time after 1975,” Thu Nghi said, who at 22 has her own company that buys, refurbishes and sells homes. From a childhood of poverty, Thu Nghi parlayed a small trading company into a thriving business and now owns four cars and numerous houses.
New money is everywhere in Saigon, the former capital of South Vietnam, because all the old money fled or was stripped away when the Communist North won the war.
In the early years of a unified Vietnam, the government pursued disastrous experiments with collectivized farms and bans on private enterprise.
The country’s leaders changed course around the time the Soviet Union collapsed, embracing the market economy, a pillar of the very system they had fought to defeat.
Since then, Saigon, a freewheeling bastion of capitalism before 1975, has returned to its roots with vigor.
Ralf Matthaes, a Canadian who arrived in Vietnam in 1993, remembers streets filled with “nothing but bicycles.”
“If you saw a car you would actually stop and stare at it,” he said.
Motorcycles have taken over the city streets now — and often the sidewalks too. The roar of so many internal combustion engines in unison is the hallmark of a modern Vietnamese city, and sounds like a giant wave crashing and rolling onto the shore.
Gone are the Communist ethos of conformity and the shunning of ostentatiousness that came with it.
A decade ago Matthaes, who manages a market research consultancy, had a Vietnamese colleague who was so embarrassed by her BMW that she covered it with cardboard when colleagues came to her house.
“That is one of the single largest changes,” he said. “Today you see people driving to a cafe and parking their car where everyone can see it. It’s gone from a society hiding its wealth to flaunting it.”
If, for the US, the war here, in which 58,000 Americans and as many as 3 million Vietnamese died, was on some level about keeping Vietnam safe for capitalism, it turns out that they need not have worried. Capitalism here churns relentlessly, aided by what Ted Osius, the US ambassador, calls “the most entrepreneurial people on earth.”
Last year, 78 percent of registered companies in Ho Chi Minh City shut down, according to government statistics, as the country was emerging from a debt crisis, but the creation of new companies has since gathered pace; 26 percent more new companies have been formed this year than in the same period last year.
City planners here speak approvingly of the intense competition and the constant cycle of corporate failure and rebirth.
The name cards of government officials still say “Socialist Republic of Vietnam,” but their talking points would bring a smile to Adam Smith.
“Weak companies will fail; that’s normal,” acting president of the Ho Chi Minh City Institute for Development Studies, a government planning agency, Tran Anh Tuan said. “They can learn from failure; that’s a good way to develop.”
Indeed, the shell of a Communist command economy remains: The state-owned companies that make up about a quarter of the economy have large debts and are not very efficient. The private sector and foreign companies are what keeps the economy buzzing.
More than 200,000 migrants a year flock to Ho Chi Minh City from other parts of Vietnam. The city counts 8 million registered residents, but estimates the total population is about 12 million.
Rags-to-riches stories are everywhere.
Tech entrepreneur Thuy Truong did not have electricity in her home until she was seven. She now develops smartphone apps and commutes between Mountain View, California, and Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. She recently sold her software firm to Weeby, a US company, for more than US$1 million. (She will not say exactly how much.) She turns 30 in December.
Nguyen Trung Tin, 28, took over his parent’s real-estate company last year. He remembers his parents’ relentless struggle to turn nothing into a sizeable fortune, with them studying Chinese, Japanese and Russian language tapes well into the night in the one-room apartment they shared when he was a boy.
Now Tin is in the thick of the glamor of the new Vietnam. He owns two nightclubs, an events company and a Thai restaurant, but he criticizes many of his generation for forsaking what had been a culture of self-improvement for a culture of materialism for its own sake.
“They see the fast cars, they have Louis Vuitton bags and Christian Louboutin shoes,” he said. “For them it’s just a question of how do I get that. They are hungry for the wrong reasons and for the wrong things.”
The easy money was made more than a decade ago, when property prices soared and millionaires were minted overnight. It now takes a lot of hard work, luck and often government connections to make a fortune.
However, Ho Chi Minh City is still a magnet for the young, a place of opportunity and fun.
Luong Thi Hai Luyen, 29, came to Saigon from her native Hanoi, the capital, to study for a master’s degree in cultural studies and find a job.
“In Hanoi, we think about the future, saving for the future,” she said. “Here they don’t think about yesterday — or tomorrow. They live in the moment.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing