After passing the support threshold in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential primary, Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) listed three criteria for her running mate. The first criterion was that her running mate should be native Taiwanese.
This statement reflects the stance of the old KMT guard that believes native Taiwanese should not run for president, but should rather work as servants for “high-class” Mainlanders.
MAINLANDERS
This mindset was adopted by former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), former vice president Lien Chan (連戰) and President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). It is also a belief adopted by Hung, who is leaning even more heavily toward China. Some journalists who are Mainlanders have moved to condemn such attitudes, as it discriminates against native Taiwanese.
Based on their own conscience, such journalists are not afraid of being accused of “manipulating the ethnicity issue,” and it is an admirable approach. Taiwanese have long been aware of their unfair and unjust treatment, but they mostly tolerate it and are unwilling to address this sensitive issue. They allow discrimination to continue, causing some older Mainlanders to believe it is justified.
DISCRIMINATION
The KMT’s discrimination against other groups based on provincial origin is ugly. Discrimination against a racial or ethnic group usually occurs when a majority looks down on a minority. For example, black people, not white people, are often discriminated against in the US.
During the apartheid era in South Africa, a minority group of white colonists discriminated against black people, a majority. After the KMT government relocated to Taiwan, it claimed to represent China and implemented its colonial rule over the land by excluding native Taiwanese.
CORRUPTION
The native Taiwanese who put themselves forward for the KMT lacked the DNA of democratic reform and were void of talent. However, the party welcomed them for the good of its image. The people doing the discriminating and those being discriminated against formed a group of corruption.
To push for the localization of the KMT, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) chose Lien, who adopted an ambiguous attitude toward provincial background, to be his running mate in Taiwan’s first direct presidential election in 1996. In the end, Lien turned out to be “deep blue.”
Before the presidential election in 2000, Lien said during a visit to Washington that there was no ethnic problem in Taiwan.
I could not take it anymore, so I said to Lien: “There might no longer be an ethnic problem in the nation economically and culturally, but when it comes to politicals, all the way from Chiang, Lee and yourself to People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) and former Control Yuan president Chen Li-an (陳履安), presidential candidates from the KMT have all chosen to team up with native Taiwanese. How do you explain this?”
Lien avoided my question at that time, saying only that he really hates to divide the people of Taiwan into Mainlanders from China and native Taiwanese because we are all from China originally. Clearly, he was willing to abuse the identity of others in order to avoid the existence of political discrimination.
James Wang is a senior journalist.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
The Ministry of the Interior late last month released its report on homes that consumed low amounts of electricity in the second half of last year, offering a glimpse of the latest data on “vacant houses” — homes using less than 60 kilowatt-hours of electricity a month. The report showed that Taiwan had 914,196 vacant houses, or a vacancy rate of 9.79 percent, up from 9.32 percent in the first half of last year and the highest since 2008, when it was 9.81 percent. Of the nation’s 22 administrative areas, Lienchiang County (Matsu) had the highest vacancy rate at 17.4
RSS