The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) silence in the face of Beijing’s announcement that Taiwanese visitors no longer need to apply for entry permits to China has many left wondering whether President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration still exists.
On Sunday, National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Yu Zhengsheng (俞正聲) announced that Taiwanese travelers to China may now enjoy visa-free privilege, adding that the form of the existing “Taiwan compatriot travel document” (台胞證) — a permit issued by Chinese authorities allowing Taiwanese to travel to China — is to be changed to an IC card.
According to the prospective changes, Taiwanese travelers will no longer have to apply for an entry permit when they plan to take a trip to China as the IC card allows the holder automatic entry.
Granted, this new measure would certainly prove more convenient for China-bound Taiwanese travelers and save money (the permit costs applicants NT$300 each entry), but factoring sensitive cross-strait political relations and the fact that China has never renounced its ambition to annex Taiwan, the proposed privileged treatment for Taiwanese travelers ought not be taken lightly.
Skeptics have reason to doubt China’s intentions.
Hong Kongers and Macanese initially visited China via a booklet travel document named the “Hong Kong and Macau resident travel permit to enter the neidi” (港澳居民來往內地通行證), which were also termed “home visit permits” (回鄉證). The paper document was changed to an IC card in 1999, the design of which was later adopted for the second-generation of resident ID cards the Chinese government introduced in China in 2004.
Given that both Hong Kong and Macau are special administrative regions of China, Chinese wanting to travel to Hong Kong and Macau do not need a visa, only a permit.
Critics have good reason to suspect that this so-called visa-exemption program “to give convenience to Taiwanese students studying in China or people doing business there” is merely an attempt to downgrade Taiwan’s sovereign status, all the while ensuring Taiwan is “Hong Kong-ized” (香港化), creating an international impression that Taiwan is part of China.
In view of the likelihood that Beijing is using the pretense of supporting exchanges between people on the both sides of the Taiwan Strait and offering visa-free treatment to make life easier for Taiwanese visitors as a tactic to further its political agenda in Taiwan, the whole matter certainly warrants a careful assessment by the government as it relates to national security and sovereignty.
The government has said it would keep a close eye on the matter as Beijing has yet to release any details.
Mainland Affairs Council Minister Andrew Hsia (夏立言) yesterday finally made the government’s first public comments on the proposal, saying: “What we care more about is whether it gives consideration to current cross-strait relations and the dignity of Taiwan.”
It is hoped that the government will review the matter to ensure it upholds the nation’s dignity and make it clear that Taiwan is not subordinate to China.
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In 2025, it is easy to believe that Taiwan has always played a central role in various assessments of global national interests. But that is a mistaken belief. Taiwan’s position in the world and the international support it presently enjoys are relatively new and remain highly vulnerable to challenges from China. In the early 2000s, the George W. Bush Administration had plans to elevate bilateral relations and to boost Taiwan’s defense. It designated Taiwan as a non-NATO ally, and in 2001 made available to Taiwan a significant package of arms to enhance the island’s defenses including the submarines it long sought.
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
RSS