Despite collecting nearly half a billion US dollars for relief after Haiti’s 2010 earthquake, the American Red Cross has built only six permanent homes and seemingly squandered millions in the nation, according to a new report.
A joint investigation by ProPublica and the US’ National Public Radio (NPR) uncovered rampant mismanagement, high overhead costs and deeply rooted acrimony from Haitians toward the aid organization. Among the investigation’s findings was that although the Red Cross apportioned about US$170 million to the category of “shelter relief” and although it at first planned to build about 700 homes, it constructed just six permanent residences.
The report charges the Red Cross with consistent misrepresentation of its projects, especially in housing. The authors cite promotional materials that say the Red Cross provided more than 130,000 people with homes and then note that that total includes people in “transitional shelters,” recipients of short-term rent assistance and people who had been “trained in proper construction techniques.”
Illustration: Yusha
The Red Cross disputes the report and asserts that it has “helped build and operate eight hospitals and clinics” and “move more than 100,000 people out of makeshift tents into safe and improved housing.” In a statement, the organization said it is “disappointed” by the “lack of balance, context and accuracy” on the part of ProPublica and NPR.
A major problem for the organization was leadership and staffing, according to the report. Integral positions, including experts for health and shelter, were left vacant for months and sometimes years. The positions that were staffed were predominantly held by expatriates or by people flown in from the US, many of whom could not speak French or Creole.
In one 2011 document, Red Cross official Judith St Fort wrote that there are “serious program delays caused by internal issues that go unaddressed,” including for cholera relief.
“There is a clear lack of foresight and planning,” she wrote. “The lack of leadership ability has contributed to poor morale in the field.”
She also urged her superiors to hire more Haitians: “The implication that talented, smart, competent Haitians cannot be found in Haiti has to be dispelled.”
In its statement, the Red Cross says 90 percent of its current staff are Haitians; the organization did not break down the hierarchy or positions of its staff.
“If they were an organization that had a real history in Haiti, I think this would have gone a lot better,” said Justin Elliott, one of the journalists who co-wrote the report. “The entire Haiti reconstruction effort has been really problematic, but the outside groups that have done better have roots there, have Haitian people working at high levels, have people who speak the language.”
In one 2013 e-mail published by ProPublica, Red Cross chief executive Gail McGovern admitted that a project had failed and that she did not know what to do with a US$20 million remainder.
“Now that the Northern project is going bust and we are still holding US$20 million of contingency [funding], any ideas on how to spend the rest of this?” she asked, before mentioning a mysterious “wonderful helicopter idea.”
Without Haitians in leadership positions, the Red Cross was particularly ill-prepared to deal with Haiti’s land-tenure rules, a system so tangled and unforgiving that it has intimidated US Agency for International Development and Vatican relief efforts.
“Land tenure is probably the biggest stumbling block,” said Jonathan Katz, a freelance journalist and author of a book about the earthquake, The Big Truck That Went By.
The system has stymied aid organizations for years and Katz said that for years, aid organizations have “thrown up their collective hands and said: ‘We do not really want to deal with this.’”
The Red Cross entangled itself in a web of other organizations, often paying them to do relief work, and themselves struggling in Haiti. This outsourcing is commonplace in the international aid industry, Katz said, and leads to inevitable, but not necessarily unreasonable, overhead costs. However, eager to better solicit donations, organizations often try to downplay these costs.
The report says that overhead charges by the Red Cross and its contractors undermine McGovern’s claim that “minus the US$0.09 overhead, US$0.91 on the dollar will be going to Haiti.”
In one case, Elliott and his coauthor, NPR’S Laura Sullivan, found that the International Federation of the Red Cross exacted US$1,560,000 in overhead from the American Red Cross’ payment of US$6 million, all to help give Haitians rental subsidies so they could leave tent camps. The federation said the costs were related to “administration, finance [and] human resources.”
In another case, the Red Cross commissioned Swiss and Spanish Red Cross societies to upgrade shelters, but still took 24 percent of the money for the project in additional overhead costs, according to the report.
Where exactly the US$488 million of the American Red Cross’ Haiti budget has gone is unclear, Elliott said, since “the whole international aid sector is pretty opaque in general. And the spending of the American Red Cross is incredible opaque. You can tell hardly anything from their disclosures.”
He said that the issue of money was particularly sensitive to Haitians who had coordinated with the Red Cross.
“They were furious basically over broken promises,” Elliott said. “About three years ago, the Red Cross told people they were going to build hundreds of new homes in this very hard-hit area and this thing was just stalled. Over the next two years they had meetings with the community, handed out juice boxes and so on and nothing happened for a long time.”
The Red Cross is now helping build a road and install solar lights in the area.
Katz said that the problems of the American Red Cross are “typical of the aid industry in general. The Red Cross is sort of the biggest kid on the block. Because they make way more money than anybody else, what they do is magnified.”
The interconnected non-governmental organizations and aid organizations of the world, ranging from the many satellites of the Red Cross to Doctors Without Borders to the Clinton Foundation, Katz said, should deserve more skepticism from the public. Reports have traced the 2011 cholera epidemic to UN relief efforts, he said, adding that many organizations operate more like businesses than anything else.
“Even when an aid group is pulling off a project well,” he said, “if it is not going to be there forever, if it is not going to be accountable for successes and failures, if it is not leaving something behind that is permanent, then it is still capable of doing damage.”
Last year, the Red Cross similarly took issue with another ProPublica report that said the organization had disastrously mismanaged aid relief after Hurricane Sandy.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath