From open-top bus tours and neighborhood rallies to bicycle protests and dance routines, campaigners in Hong Kong are employing a range of tactics to win hearts and minds ahead of a key vote on the territory’s political future.
However, for many residents, the canvassing and rhetoric is starting to wear thin as they accuse politicians of losing touch with the issues that affect their daily lives.
The territory’s government says its proposal to hold the first public vote to elect a leader — currently chosen by a pro-Beijing committee — is a step forward for democracy.
Opposition legislators and activists, however, reject the motion for 2017 as “fake democracy” as it sticks to Beijing’s ruling that candidates must be vetted by a loyalist committee.
That decision sparked mass student-led street rallies that shut down parts of the financial hub for more than two months late last year in what is known as the Umbrella movement.
Pro-democracy lawmakers make up more than a third of Hong Kong’s Legislative Council and have vowed to block the proposal, which needs a two-thirds majority to pass. The vote is expected to take place in June.
Campaigners from both camps are eager to show that they have popular support.
In recent weeks, senior government politicians have toured neighborhoods in open-top buses and are dropping in to deliver their “Make It Happen” message.
A campaign speech by Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying (梁振英) saw a group of middle-aged women dance a choreographed routine to popular Chinese tune Little Apple. A pro-government singer even delivered an off-key rendition of Under a Vast Sky by Hong Kong band Beyond, traditionally a pro-democracy anthem.
UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE
Elsewhere on the streets, pro-government group Alliance for Peace and Democracy (APD) said it had gathered 1.2 million signatures supporting the election plan.
“Hong Kong can choose between universal suffrage, having an election and voting for their own chief executive in peace, or they can decide to reject it and...bring chaos to Hong Kong,” APD spokesman Robert Chow (周融) said.
Pro-democracy campaigners have also toured local neighborhoods on trucks and protesters with yellow umbrellas — symbol of the democracy movement — regularly interrupt official events and campaign speeches.
Pan-democrat legislators bicycled through some of the territory’s most densely populated working class areas to deliver their message.
“We need to make use of every minute before the vote to remind Hong Kong people why you would end up worse off by pocketing the government proposal,” Civic Party leader Alan Leong (梁家傑) said.
“We don’t want our vote to be used as a way to legitimize an electoral model that does not give Hong Kong people real choice,” he said.
A rolling poll by three leading universities shows that the public is split.
The latest figures, based on a survey of more than 1,100 people, show 46 percent oppose the government’s plan while 39 percent support it, with 15 percent undecided.
While there are vocal supporters on both sides, many feel alienated by the political tug of war.
“I don’t support either side. Both sides are too extreme,” student Patricia Lam said.
“It’s a waste of time as there is no consensus at all,” she said.
Housewife Yu Lai-mui, 59, said rising rail fares and building a better airport were more important.
“The Occupy movement was too radical,” she said, referring to one of the most vocal groups involved in the months of protest at the end of 2014.
“I didn’t support it. On the other hand, even if the political reform is passed, I don’t see how it can bring advantage to people’s livelihoods,” she said.
CAMPAIGN NUISANCE
In a territory with a widen/bing wealth gap and soaring housing costs, some say they are simply concerned with survival.
For 94-year-old Mok, telephone calls from political campaigners are a nuisance.
“I have hung up on them. At my age, I just care about my two meals a day,” he said.
“I work 18 hours a day. I don’t have time to care. Even if I do, what difference can I make?” 50-year-old construction worker Law said.
Although the pro-democracy movement has fragmented, there are still small-scale protests in busy Mong Kok, which saw some of the most violent clashes during last year’s rallies.
However with no government concessions to date, residents fear that taking to the streets will have little impact.
“Sometimes they take over space around you and start shouting. I don’t see the point. I am quite fed up and feel powerless. I think a lot of Hong Kong people feel the same,” local phone service vendor Cheung said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath