At night, the neon lights of Taipei 101 shine over the capital. Sometimes, entire floors of the building are enshrouded in clouds, with only the needle at the top of the building exposed. Is this the glory of Taipei?
At night at a crosswalk on Dunhua S Road, there is a beggar bent over on the ground holding an empty jar for pedestrians to throw money in as they walk by. His situation deserves some sympathy. However, sometimes through the thick, cold air I hear some people utter swear words as they pass.
From the era when money flowed into the nation, Taiwan has evolved into a dog-eat-dog society, with strangers crying as others pass them by. To beggars lying on the street, a building that towers in the clouds like Taipei 101 presents a sharp contrast to the glory of the big city, both a bright and dark side.
The 20th century is over. At an art gallery in Cologne, Germany, there is a sub-theme within a 20th-century-themed exhibition that shows both the beauty and dark side of capitalism: Metropolitan areas around the world with glass-covered buildings, luxury and downtown shopping streets standing in contrast to shanty towns and scenes of ragged alleyways.
So what of the beggar on the ground? What of the people who curse them and do not extend a helping hand? This is class-based hate. In a society with extremely unequal wealth distribution, resent takes shape. Is this an issue that can be resolved with a lofty wall of strict preservation? How can one protect oneself, yet deal with the problem?
Taipei’s Dunhua S Road, a boulevard, has commercial skyscrapers lining both of its sides. When former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) was in office, NT$100 million (US$3.19 million) was spent on bike paths along the road despite opposition. Due to their ineffectiveness and alleged traffic problems they caused, the bike paths were abolished. In just a few months, public funds vanished, in the blink of an eye.
That a big city like this has beggars lying on the street at night — what kind of city is this to boast about? After spending such a large amount of taxpayers’ money, in the blink of an eye they splurge even more on a building project.
After spending a fortune, the lights of skyscrapers only reflect the government’s attitude of carelessly wasting money without blinking an eye. The money earned through residents’ blood, sweat and tears is often squandered and wasted by corruption.
Compared with other Taiwanese cities, Taipei, where money is piled high, has a heartless sense of arrogance along with the irony of beggars lying on dark street corners.
When spending money on construction, carefully consider the dark background of a city’s glory when choosing the project’s slogan. Class-based resentment is often repressed in the darkness underneath it all.
Through collusion between big business and government, the wealth gap has widened to the point of unilateralism that is prevalent today. We must not ignore this social phenomenon and we cannot afford to not reflect on this problem.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Zane Kheir
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath