Bring back Peng-Lee show
Peng Wen-cheng (彭文正), a professor at National Taiwan University’s (NTU) School of Journalism, and his wife, Amanda Lee (李晶玉), resigned from hosting Next TV’s political talk show Jeng Chin Talk (正晶限時批) on Monday (“Media activists urge NCC to probe Next TV, Tzu Chi,” March 19, page 1).
This political talk show, which was hosted by Peng and Lee, jumped from ground level to the No. 1 talk show during its short life of 225 days.
The show’s name originates from the couple’s given names, and means “a straight and crystal clear express mail.” Their show was fair and objective. Several leading political commentators — mingzui (名嘴) or “famous mouths” — were invited to each show.
Peng is Hakka Taiwanese, and Lee is a descendant of a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government official. Peng supports independence or unification, whichever most Taiwanese prefer.
When former premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) wished to go back to NTU as a professor, Peng — in view of Jiang’s brutality in dealing with participants in the Sunflower movement — declared that he would quit his job at the school if Jiang were rehired.
Peng is very sharp and humorous, and occasionally used pertinent catch phrases in the show; while Lee is an intelligent and beautiful cohost.
Next TV should kindly invite Peng and Lee back to host the popular talk show which was named after them.
The Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation, called “the light of Taiwan” (台灣之光) for its relief efforts in Taiwan and many parts of the world, should continue to shine brightly, but also allow a light to be shone on its own organization.
All organizations, including governments, political parties, corporations and religious and relief groups, as well as public figures, should be open-minded and welcome any evaluations and comments about their performance. They should never sue or exert pressure on commentators.
A free and democratic nation cannot survive without free speech and freedom of the press.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath