The Kaohsiung City Government is planning to pass an ordinance on the management of the city’s existing industrial pipelines that would require that companies laying pipelines in the city move their headquarters there. This is a direct challenge to the central government and the companies involved in last year’s deadly pipeline explosions. Increasing tensions over the decision are likely to follow.
The city government’s anger has grown over decades: As the center for Taiwan’s petrochemical industry, Kaohsiung has long suffered from air and water pollution caused by the industry and the safety threat posed by underground pipelines.
However, while their plants are in Kaohsiung, the companies’ headquarters are in Taipei. This means that most of the tax revenue goes to Taipei. As Kaohsiung has experienced a long period of financial difficulty, this is something its residents find hard to swallow.
The city has repeatedly asked the central government for compensation, but there has been little response. Last year’s explosions once again highlighted the issue, giving the city government an impetus to engineer a showdown with the petrochemical industry and central government.
The Ministry of Economic Affairs initiated talks on the development of the petrochemical industry and the pipelines, but progress has been slow. As far as the companies are concerned, shifting their headquarters to Kaohsiung is not only a matter of relocating offices, it also involves moving staff, and many of the companies have little interest in complying.
The ministry says the city’s proposal will affect the companies’ property and business rights, and violates the “principle of inappropriate connections,” according to which government departments should only consider factors related to the matter at hand and disregard factors unrelated to the intended effect of their exercise of power.
The ministry will submit the city’s plan to the Cabinet for reference and if the Cabinet decides that the decision was unconstitutional, it could, based on Article 30 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法), inform the Kaohsiung City Government in writing that the city’s decision has been annulled. If that were to happen, the city could ask the Judicial Yuan for an interpretation.
The ministry has criticized the city’s demand that the owners of existing pipelines must move their headquarters to Kaohsiung before the end of next year to be allowed to continue to use those pipelines, and that the maintenance of the pipelines is the operational responsibility of these companies, even though the city says that this has nothing to do with the location of corporate headquarters.
By trying to force companies to relocate to
Kaohsiung, the city is violating the concept of inappropriate connections in administrative law and exerting a great deal of influence over the companies’ use of property and their overall economic development, which could be a violation of the constitutional protection of property and business rights, the ministry said.
Both Kaohsiung and the ministry are waving law books around as if preparing for a legal battle, but the dispute may not go that far. It is more likely that the city government is trying to use the threat to bring about peace. By raising the issue’s visibility, it is forcing the central government and the industry back to the negotiating table.
While the pipeline issue remains unresolved,
Kaohsiung residents remain fearful that they are living over ticking time bombs. The city government might not intend to fight a legal battle with the central government and petrochemical industry, but the question is whether the latter two are getting the message.
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China