Ko’s comments not crazy
On Jan. 20, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was interviewed by Foreign Policy magazine. He said he was a servant of the people; not a professional politician — a professional trauma surgeon, but he had been examined as if he were the president.
However, he has done a very good job speaking up for Taiwanese. Of course his answers were totally unacceptable to China and the pan-blue camp, and not even the pan-green camp liked them.
On the issue of Asia and colonization, Ko said: “For the [world’s] four Chinese-speaking regions — Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong and mainland China — the longer the colonization, the more advanced a place is. It is rather embarrassing. Singapore is better than Hong Kong; Hong Kong is better than Taiwan; Taiwan is better than the mainland. I’m speaking in terms of culture.”
The pro-Beijing Global Times criticized Ko’s comments in an editorial, calling him “crazed” for “not putting his pro-independence sentiments in check.”
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Huang Wei-che (黃偉哲) said: “No country in the world would like to be colonized.”
Ko is not crazed, he simply pointed out what Taiwan is today. Since Portuguese sailors called Taiwan “Formosa” in 1544, it has been occupied and ruled by Holland, Spain, Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功), better known in the West as Koxinga, the Qing Dynasty, Japan and the exiled Republic of China (ROC) government. Which dynasty was built by Taiwanese?
Ko just expressed the truth: Taiwanese have never been their own bosses and Taiwan has never been independent. It is still ruled by an outsider government.
No one would like to be colonized, but Taiwan has been constantly colonized. Why did Taiwan’s political leaders not tell the truth, instead of saying Taiwan is the ROC and the ROC is Taiwan? No, the ROC is China and Taiwan is a colony of the ROC.
So, when answering the question of colonization, Ko said that it was cultural, not political, because Taiwan has suffered the longest colonization and is still in political purgatory.
On the issue of cross-strait relations, Ko asked: “What is the ‘one China’ principle?”
It is a good question, because he has the knowledge to challenge the concept. The US does not talk about “one US,” nor are there calls for “one Japan,” “one France” or “one Germany.” Only the Chinese insist on “one China.”
The “one China” policy was first mentioned in the Shanghai Communique on Feb. 28, 1972. It was a term created by then-US national security advisor Henry Kissinger based on the feud between Mao Zedong (毛澤東) and Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正). Kissinger figured it would take a while for the ROC and China to merge into “one China.”
There are at least three different versions of the “one China” policy. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) says it represents China, including Mongolia. The Chinese Communist Party claims it is representing all China, including Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau.
The US says the ROC and China will eventually be unified, but Taiwan is excluded. That is why the US’ Taiwan policy is firmly based on the Three Communiques and its Taiwan Relations Act.
Before the Earth was identified as spherical, Pythagoras was called an idiot in Greece. The wisest Chinese strategist Zhuge Liang (諸葛亮) said heaven was a dome and the land was flat as a chess board.
Is Ko crazed? No. He is sharp, smart, frank, straight-forward and knowledgeable.
John Hsieh
Hayward, California
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath