The National Development Conference started the new year with five opening salvos, including plans to strengthen regional balance, establish a national brand and recruit talent from overseas. Policymakers and planners have clearly been very busy, but prolificacy a literary masterpiece does not make, and national economic policymaking is not a writing competition.
It is difficult to remember all the grandiose initiatives the government has come up with over the past few years. We have had the proposed Golden Decade national prospects, the Six Key Emerging Industries initiative, the Ten Major Service Industries plan, the Three Industries, Four Reforms concept, the Economic Power-Up plan, the Cheng Ho plan and the Long-Term Plan proposal, to name but a few.
If you want to make the economic situation in Taiwan look positive, all you need do is take China out of the equation, and you are halfway there.
In 2013, when the government was trying to push the cross-strait service trade agreement and the proposed free economic pilot zones proposals through the legislature, both were blocked by what later became known as the Sunflower movement, which was essentially a pro-localization movement. Despite this, Taiwan’s economic growth last year outpaced that of South Korea, Hong Kong and Singapore, putting Taiwan in pole position among the four Asian Tigers and demonstrating the importance of placing one’s faith in the nation.
Therefore, if the government really wants to improve the economy and win back the hearts of Taiwanese, it should turn its attention to the following items, without any further delay.
First, United Microelectronics Corp should put any plans to invest US$6.2 billion in a joint venture to build a 12-inch wafer fab in China’s Fujian Province on the back burner and divert that money into investment in the Southern Taiwan Science Park — which would be in line with the “improving regional balance” part of the five initiatives and boost the nation’s high-tech industry.
The Chinese are desperate to get their hands, through UMC, on talent and technologies from Taiwan’s semiconductor industry so that they can complete their huge initiative to promote the development of China’s integrated chip industry. They have in their sights the Taiwanese semiconductor industry.
If Taiwan’s government has faith in the nation, it will do its utmost to ensure that UMC’s investment money is diverted to Taiwan to further bolster the domestic semiconductor industry.
Second, Beijing suddenly took a lot more interest last year in the annual Cross-Strait CEO Summit in Taipei after the drubbing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) received in the November nine-in-one elections, trying to attract major Taiwanese companies, such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), to participate in China’s national development transformation plan. Meanwhile, the pro-China media in Taiwan have been putting out stories like “TSMC plans to set up a 12-inch wafer fab in China” to create a sense of immediacy.
Given all this, the government should be doing all it can — including the environmental impact assessment report — to help TSMC complete its 18-inch wafer fab investment project, and to dig deep and fork out the US$12 billion investment for next year, to consolidate Taiwan’s semiconductor industry.
Third, Hon Hai Precision, or Foxconn, is planning to invest 35 billion yuan (US$5.6 billion) in Hainan, China, to manufacture LCD screens for Apple Inc’s iPhone7. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) should step in and advise Hon Hai chairman Terry Gou (郭台銘) to divert these funds to Taiwan in line with the government’s goal of encouraging Taiwanese companies to return home.
Ahead of the nine-in-one elections, Hon Hai also announced that it would, within the next two years, invest NT$90 billion (US$2.87 billion) in the Southern Taiwan Science Park to build a 6G low temperature polysilicon plant and another NT$200 billion in Taichung to get into the territory of the Internet of Things. The Ministry of Economic Affairs should do all it can to help it complete this plan in the short term.
In the past few years, South Korea has fallen hook, line and sinker for the “free-trade agreement” trap. It has pursued such pacts with Europe, the US and China, which on the surface appear to be good for specific industries, but have actually been detrimental to a larger number of other industries.
At the beginning of the new year, the government adjusted downward its economic growth forecast for this year from 3.9 percent to 3.4 percent.
The government should forget about the cross-strait service trade and trade in goods agreements, as well as the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership. Instead, it should concentrate its time and efforts on the three items mentioned above and manage and promote the domestic investment environment. If it does, it will win back the trust of the public, and Taiwan’s economy will surely soar once more.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser.
Translated by Paul Cooper
During the long Lunar New Year’s holiday, Taiwan has shown several positive developments in different aspects of society, hinting at a hopeful outlook for the Year of the Horse, but there are also significant challenges that the country must cautiously navigate with strength, wisdom and resilience. Before the holiday break, Taiwan’s stock market closed at a record 10,080.3 points and the TAIEX wrapped up at a record-high 33,605.71 points, while Taipei and Washington formally signed the Taiwan-US Agreement on Reciprocal Trade that caps US tariffs on Taiwanese goods at 15 percent and secures Taiwan preferential tariff treatment. President William Lai (賴清德) in
As red lanterns adorn street corners and social media feeds teem with zodiac divinations, the Year of the Horse has arrived. In our hyper-accelerated age, the horse is almost exclusively synonymous with the idiom ma dao cheng gong (馬到成功) — “instant success upon arrival.” It is a linguistic shot of adrenaline, fueling the thrilling illusion that once the bell tolls, our lives would screech off into a cloud of dust, leaving all troubles behind. Yet, when examining the millennia-long partnership between humans and this magnificent “biological machine,” a different truth emerges. The true essence of the horse is not merely speed;
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Deputy Chairman Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) earlier this month led a delegation to Beijing to attend a think tank forum between the KMT and Chinese Communist Party (CCP). After returning to Taiwan, Hsiao spoke at length about “accumulating mutual trust” and letting matters “fall into place,” portraying the forum as a series of discussions focused on cooperation in tourism, renewable energy, disaster prevention, emerging industries, health and medicine, and artificial intelligence (AI). However, when the entire dialogue presupposes the so-called “1992 consensus — the idea that there is only “one China,” with each side of the Taiwan
India is getting richer every year, but its cities do not seem to be getting any more livable. Not because the country is too poor, or because leaders lack ambition, but because urban citizens are starved of funds and deprived of representation — and the government is in no hurry to fix it, even though people are dying as a result. Mumbai’s skyline is dotted with opulent glass towers, and it calls itself India’s commercial capital. The civic body, the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corp, is the country’s richest. Yet, residents have lived for years with no say in how their city was
RSS