KMT railroading THSRC
The fiasco over the proposal to revive Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) shows that the Ministry of Transportation and Communications’ policymaking process is murky and the purpose of government intervention does not have the best interests of the public in mind.
This is one more instance that makes President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration unpopular and untrustworthy. The suspicion is that there is collusion between politicians and big business.
The government’s action lacks moral persuasion. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was unfriendly toward Continental Engineering Corp (CEC) chairwoman Nita Ing (殷琪), a former THSRC chairperson, from the outset. KMT legislators were unsupportive of her plan to finish the project when Nita was working closely with the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration and constantly questioned the safety of the operation. Then her proposal to restructure the financial plan was rejected based on the argument that it would not profit shareholders.
The problem is, the fruit of success and the burden of hardship were not shared fairly. The CEC, one of the THSRC’s five original investors, and the original shareholders deserve better for carrying out the great challenge to build the rail system and taking the high risk to finance the project. Any latecomers would give people the impression that the KMT administration was robbing Peter to pay Paul.
There has been no attention paid to the history of Tang Eng Iron Works Co, which was taken over by the KMT in 1962. Tang Eng was very successful at the time, teaming up with Mitsubishi and expanding quickly to help supply the Vietnam War effort.
A Wikipedia report is erroneous in this regard, saying that Tang Eng suffered financially because of Vietnam War. The truth of the matter is that the KMT did not allow Tang Eng to extend credit when a small loan was due and took over the entire company by forcing Tan Eng into bankruptcy. The company’s president, unable to cope with the political tyranny, suffered a stroke and died at a young age.
If Tang Eng could have remained private, Taiwan would have been able to compete well with modern South Korean heavy industry, given that it was Mitsubishi’s equal after the World War II.
Sadly, the KMT does not pay attention to history and is attempting to squeeze out of THSR the people who can build a better Taiwan.
With the US government’s dealings with Elon Musk, the chief executive of Tesla and SpaceX, it can be understood why the US is a world leader in technology and innovation. When it sees strong business leaders, it supports them and helps them to help society, creating a win-win situation.
The zero-sum mentality on the part of KMT is why Taiwan’s economy is stagnant and incomes are declining. There are many other sound projects the ministry could undertake. Electric cars and fuel-cell vehicles will take over the automobile industry in the near future. The innovation of Gogoro to build electric scooters and charging stations appears to fit well with this trend. This will help with air pollution, which has long been considered a major contributing factor to cancer, as well as paving a path to the world market.
The ministry needs to set its priorities right to help build Taiwan’s transportation infrastructure for the 21st century while avoiding political smear campaigns.
James Hsu
Santa Carina, California
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath