Despite the government’s repeated promises to keep food safe, the nation has again been shocked — this time by the discovery that as many as 116 tofu products, produced by more than 20 food manufacturers, contain toxic industrial-grade dye. The discovery shows that the government’s prior moves on food safety were little more than sops to appease public anger, and that officials do not care about food issues.
There is an old saying that says: “Eating is the heaven for the people.” It seems that in Taiwan, “heaven” is not such a perfect place.
In this year alone, there have been at least 12 food safety scandals, which include false labeling, chemical residue, the illegal addition of chemical substances, revision of expiration dates and the marketing of imported or lower quality foods as locally produced or higher quality foods.
In September, it was discovered that a cooking oil producer in Pingtung County manufactured its products with recycled oil. Before the public was able to recover from that shock, Ting Hsin International Group (頂新國際集團) was exposed for having purchased animal feed-grade oil from Vietnam and selling it as cooking oil.
Every time there is a food scandal, the government has promised to impose stricter inspections, amend relevant laws to impose harsher penalties on violators and vowed to put an end to the scandals.
Less than a month since the government’s latest vow, a new food scandal has erupted, and this time it was Hong Kong’s government that discovered that there might be banned substances in dried tofu snacks imported from Taiwan.
Taiwanese authorities have said they did not know that the chemical dye would be used in food production and “promised” to pay more attention to the issue. However, if Hong Kong’s government could discover the problem, why could ours not do the same?
Another sign of the government’s carelessness about food safety is the recent decision to halt the supply of water for farm use due to a drought, which will affect as much as 5,800 hectares of rice paddies in Miaoli County and Greater Taichung in the spring planting season.
In an effort to promote industrial development in recent decades, a great deal of arable land and water for irrigation has been given over to industrial use, bringing down Taiwan’s food self-sufficiency to about 30 percent.
The government has made repeated vows to improve food self-sufficiency, yet it has never done anything concrete about it. Whenever there are conflicts between the agricultural and industrial sectors over land or other resources, it has always been agriculture that has lost out.
The food safety and self-sufficiency issues may seem unrelated. However, they are actually closely connected, as, from a broader point of view, they both show that the government has scant regard for “the heaven of the people.” Moreover, they show that the government, despite whatever it has promised, regards the industrial sector and large corporations as more important than the lives of ordinary people.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lost badly in last month’s nine-in-one elections. Though the reason behind the election results may be complicated, one of the key factors was the food safety issue.
The government — whether it is run by the KMT, the Democratic Progressive Party or any other political party — should always deal with “the heaven of the people” properly.
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
An American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) spokesperson on Saturday rebuked a Chinese official for mischaracterizing World War II-era agreements as proving that Taiwan was ceded to China. The US Department of State later affirmed that the AIT remarks reflect Washington’s long-standing position: Taiwan’s political status remains undetermined and should only be resolved peacefully. The US would continue supporting Taiwan against military, economic, legal and diplomatic pressure from China, and opposes any unilateral attempt to alter the “status quo,” particularly through coercion or force, the United Daily News cited the department as saying. The remarks followed Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently sat down for an interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson in which he openly acknowledged that ChatGPT’s model behavior is indeed influencing the entire world, and that he himself is responsible for the decisions related to the bot’s moral framework. He said that he has not had a good night of sleep since its launch, as the technology could bring about unpredictable consequences. Although the discussion took place in the US, it is closely related to Taiwan. While Altman worries about the concentration of power, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has already weaponized artificial
RSS