Empowered young voters
Two things in the wake of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) “bloodbath” of the nine-in-one elections are indicative of how out of touch the party really is: First, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) still does not fully grasp the almost universal distrust that Taiwanese have for his very questionable leadership; and second, Greater Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強) is certainly lacking insight into just what it is that younger voters want so badly.
The vast majority of Taiwanese want to see their leaders lead with a sense of purpose beneficial to all, not just a chosen few.
They are so tired of the ruling party caring only for lining its own pockets. They have grown weary of the KMT’s collaborating with a country that will take away their liberty and rights to a better life through hard work. And yes, they want higher wages and more employment opportunities.
What younger voters should feel now is a sense of empowerment. They can make a difference when they work together. They can make the old power structure open its eyes to the fact that the old ways are not the way it will be.
However, with all this, the younger generation of voters needs to understand that they now have a responsibility to the nation. They have a responsibility to seek to better the way Taiwan is governed. They need to make an all-inclusive government, make it fair and equitable for all.
China has long sought shortcuts to developing semiconductor technologies and local supply chains by poaching engineers and experts from Taiwan and other nations. It is also suspected of stealing trade secrets from Taiwanese and US firms to fulfill its ambition of becoming a major player in the global semiconductor industry in the next decade. However, it takes more than just money and talent to build a semiconductor supply chain like the one which Taiwan and the US started to cultivate more than 30 years ago. Amid rising trade and technology tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, Beijing has become
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Toward the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) final term in office, there was much talk about his legacy. Ma himself would likely prefer history books to enshrine his achievements in reducing cross-strait tensions. He might see his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore in 2015 as the high point. However, given his statements in the past few months, he might be remembered more for contributing to the breakup of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). We are still talking about Ma and his legacy because it is inextricably tied to the so-called “1992 consensus” as the bedrock of his