Turkey’s effort to play a role in resolving Libya’s deepening conflict risks further damaging its strained relations with its Western allies, by fueling suspicions that it is doubling down on a pro-Islamic regional agenda.
Libya has descended into chaos three years after the toppling of former Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi, with warring factions battling for control and the capital Tripoli currently run by an alternative government partly backed by Islamic groups.
Turkey’s appointment last month of a special representative to Libya, who became the first envoy publicly to meet with the internationally unrecognized authorities in Tripoli, is part of Ankara’s efforts to promote UN-backed peace negotiations, senior Turkish officials said.
However, the move has bolstered the perception of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan as determined to press on with a policy of backing Islamic movements since the 2011 “Arab Spring” revolts, hurting Ankara’s reputation in the West as a regional broker.
Erdogan’s criticism of the internationally recognized Libyan government’s move to the eastern city of Tobruk has done little to help, according to H.A. Hellyer, non-resident fellow for the Center for Middle East Policy at the Washington-based Brookings Institution.
“There’s an opportunity for Turkey to be perceived as having a much more ethical foreign policy than other nations. The problem is that instead it’s coming across as being as partisan as everyone else, just in different directions,” Hellyer said.
Libya’s disintegration comes as international efforts to tackle the Islamic State (formerly known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant) insurgents in Iraq and Syria have highlighted stark strategic differences between Turkey and its regional and international partners.
Ankara has been reluctant to play a front-line role in the US-led military coalition. US officials have said Turkey’s open border policy with Syria helped allow radical groups to grow there.
Meanwhile, diplomatic ties with Cairo have crumbled over Erdogan’s outspoken support for ousted former Egyptian president Mohamed Morsi, backed by the Muslim Brotherhood, reinforcing the image of Turkey’s leadership as wedded to a pan-Islamic ideology.
Turkey’s Libya envoy Emrullah Isler, an Islamic theologian fluent in Arabic, has been one of Erdogan’s key aides and his appointment suggests Turkey’s policy in Libya, where it wields considerable cultural and economic clout, is unlikely to change.
Isler’s meeting with self-declared Libyan Prime Minister Omar al-Hasi in Tripoli went directly against the wishes of the wider international community, who do not recognize Hasi, one Ankara-based diplomat said.
Isler returned to Libya shortly afterwards to meet the government in Tobruk, but the visit did little to dispel doubts about Turkey’s motives, the diplomat said.
“Which negotiating table do they want and with what ground rules? Or do they just want their guys in a position of strength?” he asked.
The Libyan government in Tobruk this month welcomed Turkey’s engagement in UN-led efforts to bring stability, but warned against “any paths, dialogues or contacts outside this framework ... which do not serve dialogue and reconciliation.”
Isler was not available to comment, but a senior Turkish official acknowledged “rumors” of Turkish backing for Islamic militants were circulating in Libya. He said that was something Ankara is keen to counter and the official defended the need to talk to all sides.
The UN and Western powers have tried to bring both Libyan sides to the negotiating table to end the chaos, but have avoided recognizing or dealing publicly with Hasi, who was elected by a rival assembly in Tripoli.
“These guys are not terrorists, they are a political reality. By denying them it’s not possible to convince them [to negotiate],” the Turkish official said.
Ankara does not want to be a mediator and backs UN efforts at peace, he said, although he added that the process needed to be enlarged to include other politicians and tribal leaders.
Confusion deepened last week when Libya’s top court dissolved the elected assembly in Tobruk as unconstitutional, a move the assembly itself rejected.
Turkey’s strong economic links with Libya give Ankara a clear incentive to push for peace. Turks still run restaurants and shops, while US$19 billion of construction projects alone have been mothballed by Turkish firms because of the fighting, according to the Turkey Contractors’ Association.
The resumption by Turkish Airlines of flights to Misrata last month is a lifeline to western Libya and Tripoli’s new rulers, many of whom hail from that port city east of the capital. Tripoli’s main international airport has been closed since July after being damaged in fighting.
Maintaining impartial links with Libya could pay economic dividends in the long run, former Turkish ambassador to Libya Uluc Ozulker said.
However, Turkey’s troubled regional relations and the sense it is taking sides risk eroding its prestige as a broker.
“Turkey as such is on the wrong the path. I believe [we] should keep away for a while from the internal problems of the region,” Ozulker said.
Additional reporting by Tulay Karadeniz and Ulf Laessing
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath