Two things were clear long before the votes were counted on Tuesday night: US President Barack Obama would face a US Congress with more Republicans for his final two years in office and the results would be seen as a repudiation of his leadership.
However, that was not the way Obama saw it. The electoral map was stacked against him, making Democrats underdogs from the start, he said. In addition, his own party kept him off the trail, meaning he never really got the chance to make his case.
“You’re in the final four,” as one aide put it, “and you’re on the bench with a walking boot and you don’t get to play.”
The Republican capture of the US Senate culminated a season of discontent for the president — and might yet open a period of even deeper frustration. Sagging in the polls and unwelcome in most competitive races across the nation, Obama bristled as the last campaign that would influence his presidency played out while he sat largely on the sidelines. He privately complained that it should not be a judgement on him.
“He doesn’t feel repudiated,” the aide said on Tuesday night.
However, in a hyperactive, deeply polarized time in history, Obama faces a daunting challenge in reasserting his relevance in a capital that is set to soon shift its attention to the battle to succeed him. If the hope-and-change phase of his presidency is long over, he wants at least to produce a period of progress and consolidation to complete his time in the White House.
He began that effort yesterday when he held a news conference and talked of conciliation with Republicans, and he plans to host Republican and Democratic leaders at the White House today. At the same time, Obama is eager to throw off the constraints of a campaign that he did not direct and begin to defend his record in a more robust way, aides said.
“He’s going to be aggressive. He’s ready to go,” said another senior official, who like others did not want to be identified discussing plans before the election results were tabulated. “We’ve got a lot of important stuff to get done in the lame duck. He’ll talk about that tomorrow. We’ve got a lot of important stuff to get done in the last two years. He’s anxious to get going on that.”
To Republicans, it sounded as if Obama was hardly chastened or heeding the message of the election, evidently more eager to find excuses than to rethink the way he has governed. Absent a change in attitude from the president and a genuine outreach on issues that matter to them, the next two years could simply usher in even more political squabbling, Republicans said.
“There’s a huge opportunity to get things done if his frame of mind is in the right place, and it’s not clear it is,” said Sara Taylor Fagen, who was former US president George W. Bush’s political director when he lost Congress in 2006. “He’s never shown an interest or willingness to work with members of Congress. Talk to Democrats — they don’t feel he ever made an effort to court them. It’s not clear he’ll make an effort to court Republicans.”
Republican representative Adam Kinzinger said both parties needed to find a way to get past their mutual suspicions to forge a new working relationship.
“He feels burned, and we feel burned too,” Kinzinger said. “For four years, it’s been a lot of mistrust on both sides.”
Just two years after Obama’s re-election, the midterm results underscored just how far he has fallen in the public mind. Nearly 6 out of 10 voters on Tuesday expressed negative feelings about his administration, according to exit polls. For every two voters who said they had cast ballots to support Obama, three said they were voting to express their opposition to him.
The electorate was deeply pessimistic about the nation, with 7 out of 10 describing the economy as not so good or poor and 8 out of 10 expressing worry about the direction of the economy in the next year.
Numbers like that discouraged Obama’s aides, who said they had not done a good job reporting the president’s record, saying that the deficit has fallen by half, unemployment is now below 6 percent, the price of gasoline has fallen sharply and the economy is growing at a decent rate.
Obama and US Vice President Joe Biden talked about that at a lunch last week, according to an administration official, and Biden later gave voice to it in a CNN interview aired on Monday.
“We have to be more direct and clear about exactly what it is we’re looking to do,” Biden said.
However, Obama was focused on the odds against him. His staff researched it and told him that no president in more than a half-century had as many Senate seats open in states lost by the president.
“This is probably the worst possible group of states for Democrats since Dwight Eisenhower,” Obama told WNPR radio in Connecticut on Tuesday.
In those red states, Obama was politically toxic and deferred to candidates who asked him to stay away. In the last days of the campaign, he visited just five states, compared with 10 states visited by Bush in similar circumstances in 2006.
“The White House concluded that it should be the responsibility of those individuals who have their names at the top of the ballot to drive the strategy,” White House press secretary Josh Earnest said.
Obama understood in some cases, but privately resented others.
“We think that was a mistake,” one aide said.
Obama’s irritation became clear when he said publicly that even if he was not on the ballot, his policies were, a comment that Republicans gleefully wrapped around the necks of their Democratic opponents. So Obama held his tongue, but privately kept quizzing his political director, David Simas, about the latest information on early voting.
Obama had long ago given up hope that he would be able to push through some of his priorities before leaving office. He told a former aide several weeks ago that he knew he would never be able to expand prekindergarten as he had once hoped and that he regretted it. However, he hopes for possible deals on corporate taxes, trade and infrastructure, and he plans to use the lame-duck session of the departing Democratic Senate to push through as many nominations as possible.
Whether Republicans are open to dealing with him in the new year remains uncertain. Senator Ted Cruz of Texas and other conservatives are set to resist. However, Speaker John Boehner is scheduled to have one of the largest House Republican caucuses in modern times, giving him more room to maneuver because he can afford to lose some dissenters if he makes common cause with Obama.
Former White House adviser to Obama Anita Dunn said that voters on Tuesday were just as negative about Republican leaders as they were about Obama. In the end voters were eager not for more failure, but for progress by both parties, she said.
“The message for anybody who’s in power is that voters are looking for a change in how they approach getting things done,” she said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing