While Taipei is normally an election stronghold for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the party’s mayoral candidate Sean Lien (連勝文) has surprisingly been lagging behind throughout the campaign, and the reason for the suffering may be his campaign team.
One of Lien’s most criticized aspects is his family connections — his great-grandfather Lien Heng (連橫) was a controversial figure who supported the Japanese colonial government’s policy legalizing opium, arguing that it is healthy to smoke the drug, while both his grandfather Lien Chen-tung (連震東) and father, former vice president Lien Chan (連戰), served in top positions in the KMT regime during the Martial Law period, and were involved in controversial incidents.
Sean Lien is therefore often labeled as “a member of the privileged class” who would not understand the problems and needs of ordinary people, especially also because he had served in top management positions at several multinational corporations immediately after receiving his law degree from Columbia University’s Law School.
While repeatedly denying that he is from the privileged class, and insisting that he knows the needs and challenges facing ordinary people, Sean Lien’s campaign team arranged a series of “work stay” programs, with Sean Lien doing different jobs — such as street vendor, scooter mechanic and car washer — for a day.
He seems to be proud of what he has been doing and has bragged about “experiencing the life of the ordinary,” and has challenged his main rival, independent mayoral candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), to do the same.
Although Ko is a much-respected surgeon, he is from an ordinary family and has worked hard to accomplish what he has achieved both professionally and financially.
If Sean Lien already knows the life of ordinary people, why would he need to have these “work stay” programs to “experience the life of the ordinary”? Obviously these programs only further strengthen his image as someone “different from ordinary people.”
Sean Lien triggered more ridicule over the weekend when he compared himself to Shakyamuni Buddha, the founder of Buddhism, by saying in his latest campaign ad that Siddhartha Gautama was also a prince, but chose to become a monk and later became a Buddha with the intention to save people.
Many were quick to criticize the ad, saying that he not only is not as enlightened as the Buddha, but also is not as determined as the Buddha, who gave up everything he had and lived simply and on minimal sustenance in search of the ultimate enlightenment.
Sean Lien does not need to be concerned about criticism of his family background, as such criticism is usual in election campaigns and he is not the only politician who has a “privileged” background. Instead of fighting a battle started by his critics, he should be fighting his own battles and highlight his positive characteristics. Many of his comrades say that he has abundant positive characteristics, but so far we have seen none.
However, Sean Lien and his team have consistently failed to respond appropriately to issues and criticism when he could have easily done so.
This may make the voters wonder whether, if Sean Lien is elected mayor, he and his team would be able to deal properly with unexpected challenges, when they cannot even deal properly with very simple challenges during a campaign.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing