The Executive Yuan’s Food Safety Office was inaugurated on Wednesday as the nation continues to be roiled by the apparently never-ending numbers of products being pulled from store shelves because of flawed ingredients and manufacturing improprieties.
Just yesterday, the Food and Drug Administration announced that 71 items found to contain animal feed-grade beef tallow — all but 12 of which had been produced by Cheng I Food Co (正義股份) — must be pulled from stores by midnight tonight, though 47 of the Cheng I products were already subject to a recall order issued earlier this month. The announcement was a reminder of the enormity of the task facing the new office.
The office is supposed to coordinate the central government’s response to and investigation of food-related violations, integrating the efforts of the interior, economic affairs, health and welfare and justice ministries, as well as the Council of Agriculture. The launch of the office is a big step forward, but several outstanding issues could cripple the new body before it has a chance to prove itself, including staffing, the fact that too many agencies are involved in different aspects of food safety and the government’s reluctance to give up its reliance on ad hoc crisis-response measures.
Inter-ministerial coordination is crucial, but what is far more important is more feet on the ground in the form of inspectors who can monitor raw material purchases and manufacturing practices, laboratory technicians to conduct product testing and forensic accountants to monitor the endless reams of paperwork and countless computer files.
The Food Safety Office should be professionally staffed and well-equipped to conduct research, testing and certification of food products, and to speak as the central authority when a food crisis arises, but instead it has a score or so of staffers transferred from various ministries that have some hand in food safety and the council, and their role appears to be designed to be largely paper-pushing. Meanwhile, its leadership already have full-time jobs elsewhere — from Minister of Health and Welfare Chiang Been-huang (蔣丙煌), who will supervise the office, to the two deputy directors: Food and Drug Administration Risk Management Director Tsai Shu-chen (蔡淑貞) and Tsai Meng-lun (蔡孟倫), an adviser to the Executive Yuan’s Department of the Interior, Health, Welfare and Labor.
Chiang has said his priority is to “rebuild the country’s food safety system as well as its image as a food kingdom,” but he has several equally pressing matters to attend to at the ministry and cannot spend all his time on building a better food-inspection system, even if that is where his expertise lies and what the nation desperately needs.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) previously said the new office would “mimic the operation of crisis intervention teams,” but that is exactly the wrong approach.
Firefighting is much sexier than probing through factory storage units and production lines, doing bookkeeping and conducting rounds of lab testing. Crises and disasters bring media attention and television interviews, while the actual work of drafting legislation and regulations to ensure the comprehensive scrutiny of every step in the nation’s food chain or conducting that scrutiny and enforcing the rules does not make for good photo opportunities.
Taiwan does not need more crisis intervention teams. It needs effective preventive measures.
The trouble is, the central government, legislators, local politicians and even the public have been reluctant to embrace the idea that prevention is better than a cure, a notion that should be applied to a host of problems facing the nation, not just food crises. Taiwan can ill afford to retain this mindset.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS