Much public anger has been directed at Ting Hsin International Group (頂新集團) over the repeated food safety scandals involving its cooking oils. The conglomerate certainly deserves all the criticism it gets for being despicable enough to exhibit such a complete lack of business ethics by selling lard-based cooking oils containing livestock feed-grade oil, not to mention that the latest food scandal is the third involving the company in a year. But where is the government in all this turmoil? What has it actually done about the “black-hearted” enterprises that put consumers’ health at risk? Exactly which effective measures has it imposed to ensure companies’ vigilance toward food safety?
On Oct. 13, the public was treated to the news that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) presided over a national security meeting that day to address food safety issues. Yet the conclusion reached at the meeting — in which Ma condemned the manufacturers embroiled in the scandals and called on the public to join forces with the government to boycott these firms — was so pathetic that the public did not know whether to laugh or cry. Ma’s conclusion left many asking themselves: “Why do we need the government if all it does when a food safety crisis erupts is ask the public to boycott the culpable companies?”
Not only has the government appeared incompetent in its handling of the matter — as evidenced by the Ministry of Health and Welfare and the Ministry of Finance’s inability to get on the same page and give the public a coherent answer on how long it will take to clarify the destinations of all the oil meant for animal feed that was imported from Vietnam — a string of media reports alleging that Ma has a close relationship with Ting Hsin founder-owners the Wei (魏) family and that he accepted a NT$1 billion (US$32.9 million) political donation from the firm have fueled public skepticism about whether the Ma administration is at all serious about ridding the nation of companies that violate food safety.
Further adding to skepticism that the government is really tackling the problem are the following incidents: The first was when a Ting Hsin private jet flew from Taiwan to China the night before prosecutors summoned Ting Hsin senior executive Wei Ying-chun (魏應充) over the latest oil scandal. Many Taiwanese cannot help but find the timing suspicious, leading to speculation that there could have been paperwork or other evidence related to the food scandal onboard the jet.
Then there was the perception that Wei was seemingly being left out of the authorities’ investigations even as many of the businesses involved had their premises searched and officials convicted, as in the case of Chang Chi Foodstuff Factory Co (大統長基) chairman Kao Cheng-li (高振利), who is serving a 12-year prison sentence. The oil adulteration scandal that Kao was jailed for erupted in October last year and saw him sentenced in December.
By contrast, the probe into Wei’s role in that scandal took a year to conclude and prosecutors finally rolled out an indictment on Tuesday charging him with fraud, forgery and food safety violations. Amid the public outcry and a slew of surveys showing high public disapproval with the government’s performance in the ongoing tainted oil controversy, Wei has been held incommunicado since Friday last week.
Politics has often been described as a sort of “performance art.” With this in mind, while it is reassuring to see the Ma government addressing public concerns, these moves are hopefully much more than some sort of political playacting, seeking only to placate public anger momentarily until the Nov. 29 nine-in-one elections are over.
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The saga of Sarah Dzafce, the disgraced former Miss Finland, is far more significant than a mere beauty pageant controversy. It serves as a potent and painful contemporary lesson in global cultural ethics and the absolute necessity of racial respect. Her public career was instantly pulverized not by a lapse in judgement, but by a deliberate act of racial hostility, the flames of which swiftly encircled the globe. The offensive action was simple, yet profoundly provocative: a 15-second video in which Dzafce performed the infamous “slanted eyes” gesture — a crude, historically loaded caricature of East Asian features used in Western
The Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office on Monday announced that they would not countersign or promulgate the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) passed by the Legislative Yuan — a first in the nation’s history and the ultimate measure the central government could take to counter what it called an unconstitutional legislation. Since taking office last year, the legislature — dominated by the opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party — has passed or proposed a slew of legislation that has stirred controversy and debate, such as extending