The nine-in-one elections on Nov. 29 are for local representatives. It stands to reason that regional issues, vision for local infrastructure and personal relations will be deciding factors in who gets elected. Nevertheless, polls suggest there are several contentious national-level issues that have proven particularly contentious with voters, but whether these drive election results remains to be seen.
There are several main reasons for these grievances.
First, there is the anger aimed at the government. The cost of living has risen across the board, property prices are out of control and salary levels in terms of purchasing power are on a par with 16 or 17 years ago. Meanwhile, GDP growth conceals the reality that the rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer and the middle class is being squeezed, while social mobility is falling. How can the 99 percent feel anything but aggrieved?
Second, that the government assembled by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is an overeducated, exclusive clique that cannot govern has been known for some time. However, they have the audacity to stand at the podium in the legislative chamber and, confronted with clear evidence of financial and food safety scandals, not investigate them. Then, when the matter is pursued by opposition legislators, they engage in a war of words, as if the food scandals were everyone’s fault and that responsibility should not be placed at the feet of the officials charged with supervising such matters.
Third, there is the anger over unscrupulous profiteers. The nation has been buffeted by waves of food safety scandals, from plasticizer additives to mislabeled cooking oils to the current tainted oil scandal. The potential damage to health is immense. The Ministry of Health and Welfare has said people can be reimbursed for any of the dubious products that have not been used. However, those who have already used the products are on their own.
Is this the best that the ministry can come up with to protect consumers’ rights? Meanwhile, the big shots in the organizations responsible can parcel off the blame, with the pretense that they are victims, too. This means that they actually get themselves some substantial compensation, while consumers have no recourse and cannot bring group compensation claims. Again: Is this the greatest fairness and justice the courts can extend?
Meanwhile, those behind the scandals are still out there, having their photographs taken with Ma or being seen cutting ribbons at inaugurations and openings with senior government officials. With the government and these unscrupulous businesspeople thick as thieves, how can voters feel anything but aggrieved?
Fourth, there are the grievances over the choice of electoral candidates. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei mayoral candidate Sean Lien (連勝文) and his father, former vice-president Lien Chan (連戰), are trying to convince people that the younger generation, if they work hard, can live in The Palace luxury apartments and drive expensive cars. They think people can walk into a chairmanship of a company as their first job. They do not seem to be adhering much to the idea that honesty is the best policy.
The electorate is more likely to be thinking: “Are you kidding?” It is not that Sean Lien is heir to a fortune that is a problem. That is not of his doing. The reason the electorate is spurning him is more because, for all his money, he cannot conceal his lack of skill.
If the electorate can only express their anger through the vote, then the next transition of power cannot be too far away.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired National Hsinchu University of Education associate professor and a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Paul Cooper
With each passing day, the threat of a People’s Republic of China (PRC) assault on Taiwan grows. Whatever one’s view about the history, there is essentially no question that a PRC conquest of Taiwan would mark the end of the autonomy and freedom enjoyed by the island’s 23 million people. Simply put, the PRC threat to Taiwan is genuinely existential for a free, democratic and autonomous Taiwan. Yet one might not know it from looking at Taiwan. For an island facing a threat so acute, lethal and imminent, Taiwan is showing an alarming lack of urgency in dramatically strengthening its defenses.
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
The people of Taiwan recently received confirmation of the strength of American support for their security. Of four foreign aid bills that Congress passed and President Biden signed in April, the bill legislating additional support for Taiwan garnered the most votes. Three hundred eighty-five members of the House of Representatives voted to provide foreign military financing to Taiwan versus only 34 against. More members of Congress voted to support Taiwan than Ukraine, Israel, or banning TikTok. There was scant debate over whether the United States should provide greater support for Taiwan. It was understood and broadly accepted that doing so
I still remember the first time I heard about the possibility of an invasion by China. I was six years old. I thought war was coming and hid in my bed, scared. After 18 years, the invasion news tastes like a sandwich I eat every morning. As a Gen Z Taiwanese student who has witnessed China’s harassment for more than 20 years, I want to share my opinion on China. Every generation goes through different events. I have seen not only the norms of China’s constant presence, but also the Sunflower movement, wars and people fighting over peace or equality,