The nine-in-one elections on Nov. 29 are for local representatives. It stands to reason that regional issues, vision for local infrastructure and personal relations will be deciding factors in who gets elected. Nevertheless, polls suggest there are several contentious national-level issues that have proven particularly contentious with voters, but whether these drive election results remains to be seen.
There are several main reasons for these grievances.
First, there is the anger aimed at the government. The cost of living has risen across the board, property prices are out of control and salary levels in terms of purchasing power are on a par with 16 or 17 years ago. Meanwhile, GDP growth conceals the reality that the rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer and the middle class is being squeezed, while social mobility is falling. How can the 99 percent feel anything but aggrieved?
Second, that the government assembled by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is an overeducated, exclusive clique that cannot govern has been known for some time. However, they have the audacity to stand at the podium in the legislative chamber and, confronted with clear evidence of financial and food safety scandals, not investigate them. Then, when the matter is pursued by opposition legislators, they engage in a war of words, as if the food scandals were everyone’s fault and that responsibility should not be placed at the feet of the officials charged with supervising such matters.
Third, there is the anger over unscrupulous profiteers. The nation has been buffeted by waves of food safety scandals, from plasticizer additives to mislabeled cooking oils to the current tainted oil scandal. The potential damage to health is immense. The Ministry of Health and Welfare has said people can be reimbursed for any of the dubious products that have not been used. However, those who have already used the products are on their own.
Is this the best that the ministry can come up with to protect consumers’ rights? Meanwhile, the big shots in the organizations responsible can parcel off the blame, with the pretense that they are victims, too. This means that they actually get themselves some substantial compensation, while consumers have no recourse and cannot bring group compensation claims. Again: Is this the greatest fairness and justice the courts can extend?
Meanwhile, those behind the scandals are still out there, having their photographs taken with Ma or being seen cutting ribbons at inaugurations and openings with senior government officials. With the government and these unscrupulous businesspeople thick as thieves, how can voters feel anything but aggrieved?
Fourth, there are the grievances over the choice of electoral candidates. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei mayoral candidate Sean Lien (連勝文) and his father, former vice-president Lien Chan (連戰), are trying to convince people that the younger generation, if they work hard, can live in The Palace luxury apartments and drive expensive cars. They think people can walk into a chairmanship of a company as their first job. They do not seem to be adhering much to the idea that honesty is the best policy.
The electorate is more likely to be thinking: “Are you kidding?” It is not that Sean Lien is heir to a fortune that is a problem. That is not of his doing. The reason the electorate is spurning him is more because, for all his money, he cannot conceal his lack of skill.
If the electorate can only express their anger through the vote, then the next transition of power cannot be too far away.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired National Hsinchu University of Education associate professor and a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing