The government likes to play fast and loose with identity issues, tailoring labels and figures to suit itself and the situation. Although there is nothing new about its efforts at misdirection, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration should still be called to account for its tactics.
Ma continually reiterates that cross-strait relations are not international relations because “mainland China” is part of the Republic of China’s (ROC) territory. This means, he says, that the “mainland” cannot be recognized as another nation within the ROC’s territory. If that is so, then the government should not be allowed to count Chinese visitors, whether in groups or individuals, as foreigners when it comes to massaging its tourism numbers, since, according to Ma et al, they do not come from a different country.
Nevertheless, the Tourism Bureau this week hailed the release of a UN World Tourism Organization report that said Taiwan had the world’s highest growth in foreign tourist arrivals in the first half of the year.
According to the UN agency’s report, foreign tourist arrivals in Taiwan reached 6.44 million for the first six months of the year, a 26.7 percent increase from the same period last year, just edging out Japan, which saw a 26.4 percent rise.
Those figures are very impressive considering the UN agency’s “World Tourism Barometer” shows international tourist arrivals were up 4.6 percent for the first half of the year.
The agency says Taiwan’s revenue from international tourism in the first half of the year rose 18.5 percent over last year’s, putting it in third place behind Japan and South Korea in the world rankings.
Tourism Bureau Deputy Director-General Liu Wayne (劉喜臨) said the growth rate reflected the nation’s international promotion efforts, especially those aimed at Asian tourists.
That sounds great until one realizes that about 90 percent of those “foreign” visitors to Taiwan were from Asia, with China, Japan and Hong Kong/Macau listed as the top three sources.
The Tourism Bureau’s statistics for last year show Chinese accounted for 35.8 percent of the 8.02 million visitors, while those from Hong Kong and Macau accounted for 14.8 percent. That means that a little more than half (50.6 percent) of last year’s tourists came from China, a figure that is likely to be equaled or exceeded this year.
And China is a lucrative market, since Chinese tourists brought US$3.63 billion in revenue in the first half of the year, the bureau said in August.
However, the government is not the only one playing around with figures. One would like to ask the UN World Tourism Organization how, since it lists Taiwan as a province of China (which has seen a 2 percent drop in foreign tourists in the first half of the year), it can accept Chinese tourist arrivals to Taiwan as foreign tourism.
Vice President Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) said that given the current tourism data and the government’s promotional efforts, he expects foreign tourist arrivals to top 10 million next year. This is a nice round number, but it would be far less round if Chinese visitors were discounted. The government should not be able to have it both ways.
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
RSS