With less than two months to go until the nine-in-one elections, close public scrutiny is needed on how various government officials and agencies conduct themselves and whether they — intentionally or unintentionally — abuse administrative power for partisan gain.
Among recent incidents that have raised eyebrows is the Executive Yuan’s announcement that it is to relax eligibility requirements for retired civil servants who qualify for year-end bonuses. Currently, the government limits the bonuses to retirees who receive a monthly pension of less than NT$20,000 (US$657). However, according to the Executive Yuan’s latest plan, starting next year the cap will be raised to NT$25,000, which would benefit more, but also add NT$1.5 billion to national expenditures.
Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) has dismissed accusations that the policy change is an attempt to attract votes for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in the run-up to the Nov. 29 elections. Insisting that it has nothing to do with the elections, he said it is only meant to better care for disadvantaged people.
Unfortunately, Jiang’s explanation is anything but convincing.
President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration has made almost no progress despite Ma’s pledges of pension reforms. The only small advance it managed was the announcement in 2012 by then-premier Sean Chen (陳?) that, following a public outcry, bonuses should only be given to retired military personnel, civil servants, public-school teachers and employees of state-owned enterprises who receive a monthly pension of less than NT$20,000.
The scheme took effect at the end of that year, but only two years in, the administration is changing the rules again. The timing is dubious, considering this is an election year. If the government thinks that people living on NT$25,000 a month are “disadvantaged,” what about workers who have to make do with NT$22,000 as a starting salary? Why the discriminatory treatment for private-sector workers and preferential treatment for public-sector retirees?
Even more suspicious is that the policy’s announcement coincided with KMT Taipei mayoral candidate Sean Lien’s (連勝文) pledge to fight for the relaxation of pension eligibility criteria for retired public workers.
Then there was the incident involving Nantou County Commissioner Lee Chao-ching (李朝卿) of the KMT, who was suspended from office in November 2012 after being indicted on corruption and other charges. The Ministry of the Interior in April last year rejected his appeal to get his job back and again in April after Lee filed a second application to be reinstated.
However, after Lee’s wife, Chien Su-tuan (簡素端), on Sept. 10 announced her decision not to run in the Nantou County commissioner election, the Executive Yuan’s Petitions and Appeals Committee revoked the ministry’s decision. The move prompted speculation over whether some sort of “exchange” was arranged in which Chien willingly dropped out of the race to avoid a possible split in the county’s pan-blue camp ahead of the elections.
Another case that has raised questions about administrative neutrality involves KMT Yilan County Commissioner Chiou Shu-ti (邱淑媞), who is also the director-general of the Health Promotion Administration. The agency spent NT$4 million on an advertisement that featured her face alone, leaving many wondering whether it was a campaign strategy to promote Chiou’s visibility among voters.
With the elections approaching, the issue of administrative neutrality is proving to be increasingly pertinent. It is imperative for members of the public to keep a close eye on the government to keep it in check, to make sure the principle of impartiality is upheld, and that a clear distinction between party politics and the state apparatus is maintained and not exploited or manipulated for partisan gains.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify