Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) on Monday accepted a Citizens’ Choice Award in New York City at the City Climate Leadership Awards ceremony, a story widely reported in Taiwan, as is any award won by the nation or Taiwanese. However, little attention was paid to another story out of New York on Tuesday, where the UN’s Climate Summit put the climate back in the top news cycle, along with the Islamic State militants and the Ebola outbreak.
Taiwan was included in a list of the top 20 countries most at risk from rising sea levels within the next 100 years in an analysis by Benjamin Strauss and Scott Kulp for Climate Central, an independent organization of leading scientists and journalists in the US.
The awards were designed to catch attention by focusing on the positive efforts cities make to reduce carbon emissions. They were established in April last year by the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group and Siemens AG, with five awards open to only C40 cities and five more open to C40 cities and those belonging to the “Green City Index,” which Siemens runs with the Economist Intelligence Unit.
Taipei was a finalist in the “air quality” category — along with London and Mexico City — for its “Clean Air: It’s Your Move” project, which promotes low-pollution vehicles, cycling and the use of public transit. London won for its plan to build a “zero emissions-capable” taxi fleet. While the winners of the 10 categories were chosen by a seven-member panel, Taipei won an award where voting was open to the public online. Nevertheless, Hau has a nice statuette to display in city hall.
It is difficult to raise public attention to a threat that might be decades off, even if planning steps to tackle that threat, like changing development strategies to account for rising sea levels and frequent flooding, must begin now.
The analysis by Strauss and Kulp gives country-by-country estimates for populations at risk of living below sea level or of regular flooding (at least once every three years) by the turn of the century, but only for those nations with populations of more than 1 million, which means that Bangladesh and the Philippines, which already suffer major flooding during typhoons and monsoons, were included, but not small Pacific Ocean nations such as the Marshall Islands and the Solomons.
Taiwan came in at No. 17 of the 20 most at-risk countries by total population, with 4 percent of its population at risk, and at No. 12 in terms of percentage of the country at risk.
Other nations in the region are also in trouble. China came in at No. 1 in the total population category, with 4 percent of its inhabitants, or 50 million people, at risk, while the Netherlands was No. 1 in terms of percentage of country at risk with 40 percent. Vietnam placed second in both categories, while Japan was third in terms of population and fourth in terms of land. Eight Asian nations placed in the top 10 large countries most at risk globally.
Strauss and Kulp said they took into account a range of potential emissions reductions as well as variations of sea level sensitivity due to climate change. However, they also said their estimates could understate the risks because they have found that global figures on elevation and population are neither as accurate nor precise as the state-of-the art data, noting that in a similar analysis conducted last year on the US’ risk of rising sea levels and flooding, “the net effect of global data was underestimation by a factor of 2 to 3.”
It is nice to receive awards and be able to pat ourselves on the back, but the long-term threats of climate change to the nation require officials, lawmakers and the public to start focusing on major changes that can be made now. A greenhouse gas reduction bill remains blocked in the legislature. That would be a good place to start.
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
An article published in the Dec. 12, 1949, edition of the Central Daily News (中央日報) bore a headline with the intimidating phrase: “You Cannot Escape.” The article was about the execution of seven “communist spies,” some say on the basis of forced confessions, at the end of the 713 Penghu Incident. Those were different times, born of political paranoia shortly after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) relocated to Taiwan following defeat in China by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The phrase was a warning by the KMT regime to the local populace not to challenge its power or threaten national unity. The
Since taking office, President William Lai (賴清德) has been an active proponent of the Healthy Taiwan initiative. As a member of the Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee, I have also contributed recommendations on various pharmaceutical policies. After the committee concluded its seventh meeting on Saturday last week, Lai announced that the government is considering a three-year suspension on the Drug Expenditure Target (DET) system’s routine drug price surveys, highlighting the need to further support drug supply resilience. While I am supportive of this policy direction, I must also stress the importance of maintaining our original objective of improving the quality of
RSS