Social responsibility is a collective duty of the public as a whole, which has its roots in morality and ethics.
All civilized countries and societies emphasize social responsibility. This does not only apply to individuals, regardless of their professions, it also applies to enterprises of all kinds, and the degree of responsibility increases as they grow in size.
Morality and ethics are about altruism. They are affected both by external factors, such as crime and punishment, and internal factors, such as enlightenment of the mind.
The social responsibility of enterprises and “enterprising spirit” are often juxtaposed.
After World War II, an increasing number of companies began calling themselves “enterprises,” but the term is often used simply out of convenience, even for firms that lack an enterprising spirit. Some use it simply to make a profit, and have no sense of their responsibility toward employees, products, customers or the environment.
Many people, who lack true religious conviction and only pray for superstitious reasons, pray for protection in the presumptuous hope of blessings, despite engaging in unethical or immoral activities.
This kind of social ill became prevalent after World War II, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) came to power.
The post-World War II era had a hugely negative impact on Taiwanese spirit. The 228 Incident saw just, righteous and enterprising people suffer, while unworthy and dishonorable people prospered.
In Taiwan Forsythia, a book written by Taiwanese novelist Wu Cho-liu (吳濁流), the author refers to the “half-mountain” — a Taiwanese person who went to China and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) during Japanese colonial rule and later returned with the Nationalist army — syndrome, in which he includes a high-ranking official of the former KMT administration Lien Chen-tung (連震東) and others.
Lien Chen-tung’s son, former vice president Lien Chan (連戰), and his grandson, Taipei mayoral hopeful Sean Lien (連勝文), are still part of the political elite.
The nation’s political sphere is full of these people.
For example, former KMT chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) was successful both politically and in business because his father, former Taoyuan County commissioner Wu Hung-lin (吳鴻麟) followed a different path to his twin brother Wu Hung-chi (吳鴻麒), who was the victim of political persecution by the party-state — murdered in the 228 Massacre.
After World War II, many big enterprises in Taiwan grew and benefited from the privileges awarded to them by the KMT regime. The benefits that these enterprises gave back to the party-state were also significant.
The network of political and business leaders and their sharing of the nation’s spoils has deep roots, and the companies they own do not have a strong sense of social responsibility.
The recent series of food safety scandals revealed that some of these big enterprises — whose products are part of many people’s lives — are unscrupulous.
Big companies that were guilty of food safety violations in the past and moved their operations to China, where they were successful, have returned to Taiwan with their illicit profits to conquer new markets in an attempt to expand by continuing to cheat and deceive the public.
With a rotten government and rotten enterprises, how can the country possibly continue to develop into a morally and ethically sound, civilized nation?
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS