Social responsibility is a collective duty of the public as a whole, which has its roots in morality and ethics.
All civilized countries and societies emphasize social responsibility. This does not only apply to individuals, regardless of their professions, it also applies to enterprises of all kinds, and the degree of responsibility increases as they grow in size.
Morality and ethics are about altruism. They are affected both by external factors, such as crime and punishment, and internal factors, such as enlightenment of the mind.
The social responsibility of enterprises and “enterprising spirit” are often juxtaposed.
After World War II, an increasing number of companies began calling themselves “enterprises,” but the term is often used simply out of convenience, even for firms that lack an enterprising spirit. Some use it simply to make a profit, and have no sense of their responsibility toward employees, products, customers or the environment.
Many people, who lack true religious conviction and only pray for superstitious reasons, pray for protection in the presumptuous hope of blessings, despite engaging in unethical or immoral activities.
This kind of social ill became prevalent after World War II, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) came to power.
The post-World War II era had a hugely negative impact on Taiwanese spirit. The 228 Incident saw just, righteous and enterprising people suffer, while unworthy and dishonorable people prospered.
In Taiwan Forsythia, a book written by Taiwanese novelist Wu Cho-liu (吳濁流), the author refers to the “half-mountain” — a Taiwanese person who went to China and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) during Japanese colonial rule and later returned with the Nationalist army — syndrome, in which he includes a high-ranking official of the former KMT administration Lien Chen-tung (連震東) and others.
Lien Chen-tung’s son, former vice president Lien Chan (連戰), and his grandson, Taipei mayoral hopeful Sean Lien (連勝文), are still part of the political elite.
The nation’s political sphere is full of these people.
For example, former KMT chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) was successful both politically and in business because his father, former Taoyuan County commissioner Wu Hung-lin (吳鴻麟) followed a different path to his twin brother Wu Hung-chi (吳鴻麒), who was the victim of political persecution by the party-state — murdered in the 228 Massacre.
After World War II, many big enterprises in Taiwan grew and benefited from the privileges awarded to them by the KMT regime. The benefits that these enterprises gave back to the party-state were also significant.
The network of political and business leaders and their sharing of the nation’s spoils has deep roots, and the companies they own do not have a strong sense of social responsibility.
The recent series of food safety scandals revealed that some of these big enterprises — whose products are part of many people’s lives — are unscrupulous.
Big companies that were guilty of food safety violations in the past and moved their operations to China, where they were successful, have returned to Taiwan with their illicit profits to conquer new markets in an attempt to expand by continuing to cheat and deceive the public.
With a rotten government and rotten enterprises, how can the country possibly continue to develop into a morally and ethically sound, civilized nation?
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS