Several years ago, the government started to hold different elections on the same date to reduce costs. Two years ago, it chose to delay the legislative elections so they could be integrated with the presidential election. Some type of election is now held every two years.
Since all officials are elected to four-year terms, the presidential and legislative elections will be followed by local government elections two years later.
After the local government elections are held on Nov. 29, the presidential and legislative elections will then take place in 2016.
Taiwan no longer holds elections every year as could happen in the past.
As central and local elections now alternate, the local elections following the presidential election take on a quality similar to the midterm elections in the US.
In the US system, midterm elections are held near the midpoint of the four-year presidential term, offering voters an opportunity to express their approval or disapproval of the president’s performance. Since the results of the midterm elections are unrelated to a change in the White House, voters are able to use these elections to send a message to the president.
In the 25 US midterm elections that have been held over the past century, US voters supported the opposition camp 22 times, to warn incumbent presidents that they had to adjust their policies.
Even though former US president Franklin Roosevelt was very popular, his party only won the midterm elections once — during his first term. Former US president Ronald Reagan failed to save his party in both midterm elections during his presidency, despite his high popularity.
Based on these precedents, almost every observer believes that US President Barack Obama’s Democratic Party is unlikely to win the midterm elections being held in November.
Since Taiwan is following the US’ example, with local elections coming in the middle of a presidential term, many people believe that Taiwanese voters will follow in the steps of US voters.
Although Obama’s approval rating stands at 41 percent, many people believe it will be difficult for his party to maintain all its seats in this November’s elections; since President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) approval ratings are only slightly above 20 percent at the moment, his Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is likely to face an even greater challenge.
In US midterm elections over the past century, former US president Bill Clinton was the only president whose party was able to remain undefeated during his second term, thanks to the economic upswing the US experienced at the time.
At present, Taiwan’s economic indicators are at a low point and winning local elections in Ma’s second term will be as hard for Ma’s party as trying to defeat gravity.
Of course, whether Taiwan’s county and city elections really are equal to the US’ midterm elections is still up for debate. Although the US’ midterm elections are not a presidential election, their main focus is the US Senate and House of Representatives, and perhaps voters pay greater attention to national policies.
When a president performs poorly, voters naturally tend to support the opposition camp, which is responsible for monitoring the president.
However, Taiwan’s county and city elections are unrelated to national policy and voters cannot use the elections to force the president to change policies. In addition, voters might be unwilling to betray their party loyalties, which could mean that the midterm election effect that occurs in the US might not necessarily occur here.
However, if we take party structures into consideration, Ma’s performance, which has not been very good, might still have a negative effect on the KMT in the elections.
US parties adopt a system of separation of powers and the party branches in each state operate independently, which means that the administrative system might be unable to control the party caucus. This could slightly reduce the president’s impact on the midterm election results.
Taiwan’s parties are Leninist-style structures, with a highly centralized power, and grassroots voters’ favorable impression of local KMT candidates could therefore be offset by Ma, who also serves as KMT chairman.
However, if the grassroots were to abandon the KMT to express their discontent with the party chairman, the situation would be unfavorable to the ruling party.
The unification-versus- independence issue has always been a key factor affecting the choices of Taiwanese voters, but this issue is not highlighted in local elections. Since the issue is excluded from this November’s elections, voters are even more free to express their opinions about the central government’s performance through their ballot.
The fundamental nature of Taiwan’s county and city elections differs from the US midterm elections, but it will still be difficult for the KMT to completely avoid the midterm election curse.
Yang Tai-shuenn is a professor in the Graduate School of Political Science at Chinese Culture University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS