Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Sun Ta-chien (孫大千) has signed a petition, along with more than 40 other legislators in the pan-blue camp, to have the threshold for annual pension bonuses for former public service employees — retired military personnel, public school teachers and civil servants — expanded to apply to those on monthly pension payments of less NT$25,000 (US$832.78), a bump up from the current cut-off point of NT$20,000.
Coming from the state treasury, this would entail an additional burden on the taxpayer of NT$1 billion to NT$1.9 billion a year. Sun said the reason for the proposed amendment was that government finances were in a more favorable state. He has perhaps forgotten that the threshold was originally amended to the lower level in 2012, as the threshold as it stood “flew in the face of what society thought reasonable,” and had been widely criticized.
Not only that, but the 18 percent preferential savings rate for retired public service employees — the justification for which continues to elude most people — costs the government an extra NT$55 billion in interest payments every year. This, and the urgent need for pension reform, not the lowering of the monthly pension threshold for bonuses, is the most pressing financial issue for the government.
However, regarding Sun’s contention that government finances are now in a more favorable state than before, from a demographic perspective, coupled with the consumer price index (CPI), there is little cause to share his optimism. Several days ago, the National Development Council announced its latest demographic projections, saying that Taiwan’s population is set to enter negative growth in eight years — four years earlier than previously forecast — and in three years, the nation will officially be an “aged society” — one in which the elderly constitute more than 14 percent of the population. This news suggests that the effect of the low birth rate is hitting sooner than expected, and with this comes an increase in the dependency rate and an aging and insufficient labor force.
Regarding prices, last month the CPI appeared to be stable, increasing by 1.75 percent from past year, but it is a different picture when we look at individual household expenditure: Food prices have increased by 4.2 percent, fruit prices are up 10.9 percent, and meat prices have gone up 12.51 percent. The public might not be feeling the “more favorable” economic situation Sun referred to.
The increase in the dependency rate, constant price rises and the falling wage levels of the last 20 years have all conspired to create a new class of working poor. Despite this, whenever an election comes around, a number of politicians try to curry favor with a certain section of the electorate, soliciting their votes.
The government is less vocal about increasing the basic wage for ordinary workers, tending to favor big business and the elite, who threaten to freeze wage increases, and in the end offers only meager increments or set conditions for wage increases to materialize.
This year, Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) has decided to take the workers under his wing, and is set to convene a meeting of the Basic Wage Deliberation Committee next week. It must be hoped that President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration bears in mind the spirit of guaranteeing basic living standards for workers and their dependents, as per the 1970 Minimum Wage Fixing Convention (No. 131) of the UN’s International Labor Organization.
What workers need is a minimum wage that enables them to support themselves. What they do not need is politicians pretending to cosy up to them in the run-up to elections.
Lin Fang-ting is a managing board director of the Taiwan Union of Labor Activists.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath