The three-day national affairs conference on economics and trade, late last month, focused on two main issues: Taiwan’s economic development strategy in globalization and Taiwan’s participation in regional economic integration and its cross-strait economics and trade strategy.
The conference was met with opposition by those who felt it was a compromise on the part of the government to the call by students involved in the Sunflower movement protest for a public conference on the Constitution.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said that the nation faced many challenges and had few bargaining chips, and he appealed to the dissenting voices to set aside any prejudices. If Taiwan is to survive, there is no room for fighting, and there is no time for prevarication; there is only time to work together and seek the best way forward, Ma said.
Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) also said that the nation cannot be allowed to founder or run aground, and that people should exercise the greatest degree of patience and tolerance. Where there is disagreement, the nation should resort not to conflict, but to democratic mechanisms, Jiang said. He added that everyone should regard the conference in a positive way, and not as a political ploy or a waste of time.
Former minister of economic affairs Chang Chia-juch (張家祝) said that the government needs to be particularly cautious when it comes to cross-strait trade relations and its China policy in general, and make sure that comprehensive measures are in place, if the nation is to avoid being over-reliant on the Chinese market.
National Development Council Minister Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔) said that Taiwan should try to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership as soon as possible and continue to further cross-strait economic and trade cooperation while reinforcing cross-strait agreement oversight, risk management and policy communication.
Evidently, there is a discrepancy between how Chang and Kuan feel the nation should proceed when it comes to economics and trade: Chang favors a diversification of risk, while Kuan prefers cross-strait trade cooperation as a basis for progress.
However, if the government wants the national affairs conference on economics and trade to mean anything, it will have to reflect upon four key points.
First, the growth rate of Taiwan’s stock market is closely tied to that of the US, so Taiwan should concentrate more on the global economy for future economic and trade development and avoid excessive reliance on China. That being said, where is the government’s risk diversification strategy?
Second, the biggest problem Taiwanese face is the rising cost of living coupled with wage stagnation, together with the economy becoming increasingly weighted to the service sector. Was this conference actually relevant to the real situation ordinary people have found themselves in?
Third, each sector has its own needs, and this means a different economic and trade development strategy for each. Where was the discussion of different, tailored strategies during the conference?
Finally, exchange rates and interest rates are two important variables for trade strategy. Again, where was the discussion of these issues at the conference?
How has this national affairs conference on economics and trade left people feeling? Did the discussion have any real relevance to ordinary people’s lives?
The government must do more if it wants the public to believe that it is doing its best. It cannot just keep whistling the same old tune, because then nothing will ever get done.
Kuo Chen-hero is an adjunct professor in the School of Business at Soochow University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath